Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's not meant to keep things even really. It's to prevent a team from getting too far ahead of others, which I think it manages to do thus far.When in reality the salary cap means next to nothing and does nothing to even out the standard of league.
Largely because CW Blue lost a lot of players before last season and thus had a very inexperienced squad with several rookies and the odd cheap player.But even with a team like CW Blue. If I stayed they would have had no real problems fitting me under the salary cap. Even though I would have been the sixth contracted player. Even if Collins got a contract, which IMO he should have. With the current salary cap they probably would have fit us all in.
Consider how cheap the non-contracted players are at Blue as well as the banked points from last season (reflecting economical spending) and the winnings for the FC trophy (reflecting successful cricket).There is a major issue with a salary that is designed to allow clubs to fit in only four contracted players, when up to seven contracted players can fit in with no real problems.
Addressed earlier.Seemingly though that what majority of players want. Allow all the sides to keep all their players, regardless of any in balance in the league. If that is case then what is the point of having a salary cap based contract system. Just have a basic contract system that limits the number of player movements. Either have a cap that actually means something or don't bother.
Rob Malone Sr. was never as good as Rob Malone Jr. in FC cricket. It's a case of the rating being adjusted to reflect the value of the player, along with the the regularity of play. It's like Pete's rating being adjusted last season to reflect his immense value in the FC game. It would have been unfair to have Rob Malone Sr. as an A rating when he was extremely mediocre in one form of the game.Also why if any club going to complain about player rating it should be Green. What is the deal with Rob Malone Jnr rating of A? Yeah he played pretty much every match, but so did his older version and was only given a rating of B.
It is for this reason that Smith has a case when appealing for Stedman to be downgraded from A. But Stedman's quality in the short form (and his success in the longer form last season) means that he simply cannot be considered anything less than a B.