• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

I am a CW moron !!

Flem274*

123/5
New Zealand are always hard workers with zero talent

England are all upper class ****s

Australia always behave like ****s on the cricket field.
 

Jonty Lathwal

U19 Debutant
I am a CW moron !!....
want to know why ?

1. I think Tendulkar is highly over rated ....
becuase by saying so I dont have to stretch much to prove why Lara (or my other presiding deity) is the next thing to God almighty.

2. I think Lara is highly over rated....
because it somehow refutes the claim of those who claim that Tendulkar is.

3. I think Murali is a cheat....
because it clearly states the case for Warne being the greatest spinner on the planet.

4. I think Warne is no where near being the best leg spinner of all times....
because that somehow justifies the claim of Murali in the all time world team.

Q5. I think those who say Shoaib should cut down his run up or run in slowly building up speed have air between their ears ....
because to me it sounds like they are criticising Shoaib, his bowling, his attitude, his being a Pakistani, maybe even his parentage.

Q6. I think those who disagree with me on anything dont know anything about the game....
because I say so !!


you are all invited to add to this list :)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:) :)
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England won the 2005 Ashes without resorting to ball tampering via XXX mints :ph34r:
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Andrew Symonds will never, ever, ever be Test-class because:
1. He capitalises on chances
2. I think he's a **** bloke from his TV interviews and on-field posturing
He'll have to score some decent runs without being let-off (which he's still never done) before he becomes Test-class TBH.

I'm afraid no-one ever became Test-class in my book by scoring runs when they needed let-offs every single time.

I really hope Symonds gets a Martyn-2005-esque (ideally worse) run sometime, because the jammy bastard 100% deserves it. Little would give me more satisfaction.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Anyone who scored any runs post-January 2001 is automatically inferior to anyone who ever picked up a bat, in any country in the world, during the 1990s.
September 2001 TBH.

And it'd really depend on whether they'd played before said date or not too, and if so how they'd gone.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
In measuring performance, first there is knowledge then there is the performance...
 
Last edited:

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Everything can be measured by stats including art, craft, skills, temperament, etc and even an assorted combination of the above.

A computer is the biggest pundit of them all.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Measuring performance = Measuring art, craft, height of bouncer, length of shoe-lace of umpire, average length of hair of spectators present, average temperature of last 30 days in a city 30 miles away...
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I don't need to watch any cricket. Statsguru is my home page and I know more about the game than everyone else put together.








Don't believe it. Wanna see some stats? :@








:p
 

Top