• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in West Indies

Flem274*

123/5
Well, Gilchrist is the first one who needs replacing (obviously by Haddin in keeping terms, but will he open? Maybe. Should he? No). I'm not insulting Jaques - tbf I'd like to see Jaques and Katich open together for Australia :cool:
Don't let the Hayden lover (think its Kazo) see that.

Reckon the WI could win a couple of ODIs tbh. The Aussie side might take a bit of adjusting, its probably not as good as in previous years (though still excellent) and WI have got some momentum.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well, Gilchrist is the first one who needs replacing (obviously by Haddin in keeping terms, but will he open? Maybe. Should he? No). I'm not insulting Jaques - tbf I'd like to see Jaques and Katich open together for Australia :cool:
I doubt they'd hit Haddin with keeping and opening duties straight up. Hopes + Hayden at this stage I'd imagine. Longer term, who knows? Wasn't much of a year for openers in domestic cricket in general, let alone OD's (Dighton and Elliott excepted).
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Longer term I imagine they'll try Marsh (hence him being in the squad). I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of batsmen were 'rotated' in the WIndies (if the series is sewn up, anyway) to give him a shot at opening.

Unfortunately by the time Hayden retires, Katich will probably be seen as to old as a long term opening option.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Prefer him in the middle order really, its a shame Symonds is scoring runs though Hodge perhaps could be ahead of Katcih still.
Are you talking ODIs here? Would be a strange comment wrt Symonds if you were, but then you did respond to a post talking about ODIs, so I dunno.

Anyways Jaques not being considered in ODIs is a strange one. Had that pretty gun 94 on debut, was in the running for replacing Katich and then after Hayden got the gig he kinda got forgotten about and pigeonholed. I certainly want to see him back in the mix. Katich will never play another ODI though, just won't happen.
 
Last edited:

Flem274*

123/5
Are you talking ODIs here? Would be a strange comment wrt Symonds if you were, but then you did respond to a post talking about ODIs, so I dunno.

Anyways Jaques not being considered in ODIs is a strange one. Had that pretty gun 94 on debut, was in the running for replacing Katich after Hayden and then he kinda got forgotten about and pigeonholed. I certainly want to see him back in the mix. Katich will never play another ODI though, just won't happen.
My mistake. I was thinking tests wrt Symonds (PEWPEW has helped me form my views of Symonds:happy: )

I'll rephrase: Its unfortunate that Katich came along when the Australian middle order has been fairly fixed in place. Same with Hodge, though my gut feeling with Hodge is he wasn't as good as he seems/ed. Thats a different topic though. Like MacGill (with Warne), Katich has been unfortunate.
 

Laurrz

International Debutant
The thing with MacGill and even worse when it comes to Casson. Is when they are not taking wickets, they still will go for plenty of runs. So they will just take pressure of the batsmen to score quickly of seamers and allow then to just see them out. As there will be easier runs down the other end.
True, but with the Windies batsmen are they capable of limiting MacGill to no wickets like say, team India? If they keep playing aggressive theres a great chance of MacGill getting a cheap wicket
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
True, but with the Windies batsmen are they capable of limiting MacGill to no wickets like say, team India? If they keep playing aggressive theres a great chance of MacGill getting a cheap wicket
If they can limit Murali to not many wickets, then I'm sure they can do the same with MacGill considering they are in similar form.
 

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
An opener with an average under 30 in List A. Outstanding. Considering the most likely team is:

Jaques
Hayden
Ponting
Clarke
Symonds
Hussey
Hopes
Noffke
Lee
Johnson
Clark

I'll retract my statement he competes with Noffke atm, but if/when Watto returns I know who I'll pick. Hopes is good ftm but when Watson returns he should walk in as a genuine allrounder who is superior to Hopes, unless another bowler starts being useless its him vs Noffke really and as Noffke fits in better with the balance of the side he would get the place unless he's bowling pies.
Hopes hasn't always been an opener at List A level, but in the last few seasons in which he has he has been very promising, not to mention his allround ability combined with that. It's a matter of personal opinion I know, but I prefer Hopes than Watson if they were up against each other for one spot, however, personally I'd have them both in the side.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
1. Jaques
2. Katich
3. Ponting
4. Clarke
5. D Hussey
6. M Hussey
7. Haddin+
8. Lee
9. Bracken
10. Hilfenhaus
11. Clark

Dave Huss and Clarkey for 10 overs of spin between them, Katich also capable of rolling his arm over.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Not a fan of Queensland players I see. Hopes is dire though.

Still prefer this side though

1. P Hughes
2. P Jaques
3. R Ponting
4. M Clarke
5. S Katich
6. B Haddin
7. S Watson
8. B Lee
9. N Bracken
10. S Clark
11. D Bollinger
 
Last edited:

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Henriques is ready as A/R IMO and could swap for Watson while Ponting's past it - go the long term option in Forrest.
 

Top