sportychic33
State 12th Man
Will Vettori still be getting paid for the matches he doesn't play in?
Not to mention one of the best T20 bowlers in the world.But but... how can that be? Isn't Vettori one of the big signings?
Yep, unless your unavaiable or injuried for the whole tournment you still get paid. I think you still get a percentage of your pay even if your injuried or unavaiable.Will Vettori still be getting paid for the matches he doesn't play in?
Thanks.Yep, unless your unavaiable or injuried for the whole tournment you still get paid. I think you still get a percentage of your pay even if your injuried or unavaiable.
But but... how can that be? Isn't Vettori one of the big signings?
I think cus he is leaving early and Maharoof had a good game they decided to go with him and Malik instead. So they don't have have to chance combinations once the finals arrive.Not to mention one of the best T20 bowlers in the world.
Different sides different tactics really.That is not a good excuse, a lot of Aussie players and WI players are leaving too but you don't see them dropped.
STOP PRESSThat is not a good excuse, a lot of Aussie players and WI players are leaving too but you don't see them dropped.
On the contrary, I'm trying to suck out a reason from Chaminda as to why he is dropped other than the leaving early theory.STOP PRESS
Leslie is actualy sticking up for Daniel Vettori!!!! (For those that do not know of Leslies opinion of Vettori, feel free to browse an NZ thread)
I might sig that.
Yeah, you're right. Afridi's bowling is often overlooked so as I said, Gilchrist would probably be the one to go for now although with Symonds leaving soon that may sort itself out.So you acknowledge the bowling problem and suggest getting rid of one of the most effective Twenty20 bowlers?
Gilchrist is by a distance the man to go. His performances have been falling away for a while and he's done little so far.
Actually I think Delhi is side that said they wanted to play an all Asian side, so thats probably the actually reason. They had this big thing about only playing Pakistan and Sri Lankan players as there overseas players. But if Vettori was as good as McGrath then he might have played.On the contrary, I'm trying to suck out a reason from Chaminda as to why he is dropped other than the leaving early theory.
It'll make me feel less lonely bashing him.
So they wouldn't have to face him?If that is the case why fork out 700 000 + for Vettori at the auction?
I guess in case Maharoof and Asif got injured. Both had some injuries clouds over them when they were picked up. They also got their preferred Pakistan/Sri Lanka players fairly cheap, so they would have had money to spend.If that is the case why fork out 700 000 + for Vettori at the auction?