I disagree. When you are the last recognized batsman, you make sure that you get the most of what is left.He had to go for it though, with Ishant and Sreesanth not likely to last long.
The product of not outs, tbh.Sharma and SS average 15 and 21 respectively.. pretty decent
No. Ishant's not outs are 0 0,0,2,4, 14. Ishant's highest score is 23 in Sydney. So he is capable of staying. Sreesanth is capable of scoring in 20s and his avg reflects rightly of his batting talent.The product of not outs, tbh.
Its preety common where egos are put to one side....Btw, has anyone noticed how friendly this series has been ? I mean Sreesanth and Steyn walking together at the end of the day, that is got to be one of the rare things in world cricket today.
Quite ironic, I felt, because Dravid is injured above the palm area of his hand... If the ball hit him there, then it shouldn't be out, right? Or is it still out if it lobs off the arm guard????Argh, Dravid out.
I've noticed (and I'm hoping its just a prolonged form slump) that Dravid has continually failed to go on with it when he gets starts and has battled his way to a 20-30 off 90-110 balls. Its unlike the Dravid of old.
Fair enough that its a tricky wicket to bat on, but we needed at least 60 from Rahul.
Anywhere below the wrist so long as hand is connected to bat.Quite ironic, I felt, because Dravid is injured above the palm area of his hand... If the ball hit him there, then it shouldn't be out, right? Or is it still out if it lobs off the arm guard????
he was hit ON the wrist, I believe... And his hand was holding the bat...... So not sure how the rule applies here...Anywhere below the wrist so long as hand is connected to bat.
Armguard, i.e. forearm area, is definitely not out
Sorry, should've been more specific - it's wrist and below, so he was outhe was hit ON the wrist, I believe... And his hand was holding the bat...... So not sure how the rule applies here...
Normally I'm very optimistic about India at home, and with Kumble in the team I would have said India to win.India, and inparticular Ghanguly and Laxman, were very good.
One feels that a collapse has to happen in this game, so who will it be?
If it hits the glove, you are out.Quite ironic, I felt, because Dravid is injured above the palm area of his hand... If the ball hit him there, then it shouldn't be out, right? Or is it still out if it lobs off the arm guard????
The pitch is not producing one brute per spell though, several deliveries are holding on the pitch or keeping low - so it is a tough pitch to bat on and to score fast on. Furthermore, he had to rebuild and ensure above all else that he did not get out and spark a dramatic collapse and so had to be super cautious. And finally, batting in a positive frame of mind is not easy, on the best of pitches, against Steyn, Ntini and Morkel with the new ball, especially for a naturally defensive player who is in bad form.I just looked at Dravid's SR of 27.35 which translates into him playing 106 balls and getting 29
on such tracks, you have to play with a positive frame of mind because you are always going to get that unplayable ball that gets you. It's how much you do before you get that ball is what matters
in Dravid's case, it looks as if he is not doing enough before he gets that 'unplayable' ball .... when he gets out to that unplayable ball not enough runs are on the board and the opportunity to score of the relatively hard ball is lost .... may be a few positive moves by him would have fetched a few boundaries and got India over 300. It's rare to find that he would not have got some balls that he could have put away in the 106 balls that he faced .... and the way he is playing, he could be bringing the bowlers into rhythm, which may not be a problem for him but could be for other batsmen
not criticizing his contribution here but looking at it from a different angle