silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Can you link to it please?Ive found it. Reading it now
Can you link to it please?Ive found it. Reading it now
Very interesting. If they are injured for more than 30 days consecutively, they don't pay them.7.2 If the Player suffers Permanent Disablement for a consecutive or aggregate period of 30 days or more during any Contracted Season then without prejudice to any other rights or remedies under this Agreement the Franchisee shall be entitled to suspend its obligations under this Agreement with immediate effect by giving written notice to the Player.
3.3 It is acknowledged that any failure by the Player to comply with the obligations in this Agreement shall not be a breach of this Agreement if (but not otherwise) the sole reason for such failure was a Player Injury or the Player's proper compliance with any International Duty or with the terms of any Existing Agreement.
"Unavailable" shall, in relation to the Player, mean that he is unable for any reason other than Player Injury to play in a Match including without limitation as a result of any International Duty, and "Unavailability" shall be construed accordingly.
So they get paid if they are injured, but not if the injury lasts for most of the IPL season (e.g 30 days).6. (a) In addition to paragraph 5 above on each and any occasion when the Player is Unavailable during a Contracted Season the Franchisee shall be entitled to reduce the Player Fee by the ratio between the total number of Matches for which the Player is Unavailable in each Contracted Season and the total number of Matches in that Contracted Season. By way of example, if the Player was Unavailable for 5 Matches out of a total of 20 then the Player Fee would be reduced by 25%.
I was under the impression this was one reason for Bond joining the ICL... that the injury provision was better in the contracts. I can't find a link though.Very interesting. If they are injured for more than 30 days consecutively, they don't pay them.
Doesnt have to be consecVery interesting. If they are injured for more than 30 days consecutively, they don't pay them.
Yup, you are right. It's 30 days overall.Doesnt have to be consec
It goes on the proportion of games you are available for.what i want to know abt the contracts is
1. If a player does not play any matches, i.e. does not show up for IPL then does he get paid?
2. what r the minimum # of matches, he has to be available for to get any kind of salary
3. Is the salary, proportional to # of matches available for?
so lets say if Symmo doesn't show up for IPL then he doesn't get paid, right? ... and if he is available for say 5 out of 14 games that Hydab plays then his salary would be 1 million divided by 14 and then multilied by 5, right? 1m / 14 * 5 = ?
Praveen Kumar?Oh brother...why is Praveen stuck in Bangalore's fifty-for-no-loss-after-twenty-overs team? He may end up sitting out and watching Steyn, Zaheer and Vinay Kumar in every match. Delhi has blown it here.
I understand, but it is a remote possibility of the boards attempting to tap up some of the lower end of the talent on display in the IPL. From what I have read, the boards do have a small share/say in the goings on of the IPL team which encompasses their area of India.No, Ranji trophy is very different from IPL and T20.