KiWiNiNjA
International Coach
Money or the bag, Wanganui?Gillespie's from Wanganui.
Money or the bag, Wanganui?Gillespie's from Wanganui.
Scratchier than a hammy slapper with crabs.NZ really should look to score at least 400 here batting first. So, once again the lower order has to score the bulk of the runs.
Can only see score updates. How was Sinclair? Did he look scrathy again?
Harsh. I am actually also a qualified umpire as well as being a former exceptionally quick fast bowler.No, you're not, as I imagine you'd probably be Deceptively D-ire Dreadful Davis. I was talking about Steve Davis. We have two Australians, both of whom are renowned for their dubious decision-making.
Very scratchy, played and missed on numerous deliveries. Surprised he didn't edge one before the caught and bowled.Can only see score updates. How was Sinclair? Did he look scrathy again?
A strike rate of 44 is perfectly acceptable on the first day of a test for mine if you're a batsman just starting your test career coming in at 5.Should Taylor be shot for playing so slowly though?
Should the batsmen be lambasted for not playing their 'natural' game, should they try play as they did in the ODI's?
Like what I've seen from the NZ openers this morning especially How. Has all the tools really to be a reasonably good test match batsman IMO (plays very straight, takes good strides and leaves well).
How to score a century this innings.
Scarily close to being a brilliant call.That's a very big call.
Though he effortlessly pulls a short delivery from Harmison for a single in the opening over. Typical Harmison so far, though a bit slower than usual - short and smashed by Bell there. Now one down leg.
WrongAll out by this evening.
With two spinners, batting first, I think the idea is to make England bat on the 5th day.But there is a train of thought that suggests if Taylor and Oram had decided to play their natural game the Blackcaps would be further along at the end of play.
Pretty much.I haven't seen a single delivery, but here's Andrew Miller's take on Harmison's performance.
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/nzveng/content/current/story/341131.html
Is he being fair?
And there's another, more reasonable school of thought that says "Shut Up"But there is a train of thought that suggests if Taylor and Oram had decided to play their natural game the Blackcaps would be further along at the end of play.
Taylor lambasted for playing slowly? Well, why don't you go and watch another 20:20. They really hit the ball hard at those games. But this match is a test match and the batsman should play the innings that the team requires. Ross comes in with four wickets down for not enough runs and you want him to smash the ball? Yeah, it would have been ****ing priceless if he'd been out attempting one of those patented smears through mid-wicket.Should Taylor be shot for playing so slowly though?
Should the batsmen be lambasted for not playing their 'natural' game, should they try play as they did in the ODI's?