Unattainableguy
State 12th Man
lol, amazing after the 2nd test, it's been Australia that have been suffering from bad decisions. Pathan so lucky here.
Dhoni not making a half-century in the test series. 'Til March the Heals one stays as well - torture!Haha, gross. What was it for?
And without opening up the whole debate again - from that shot it seems Irfan doesn't seem overly concerned when the Australians swear at him.Pathan finally run out, amazing direct throw, not lucky this time.
thanks for that.. wasnt sure myself2) There is no point in India keeping wickets in hand. D/L does not change the fundamentals - i.e. score as many runs as you can.
FTR, Australia's target will be increased by approximately 1.
I agree. I think that's just the miminum IND need to score to have any chance. But I personally think even if the target were like 250, AUS would win easily on this wicket.it looks like Australia will chase 200 in 45 overs
how so? it will move a lot on this wicket through the air i reckon and even off the pitch..I agree. I think that's just the miminum IND need to score to have any chance. But I personally think even if the target were like 250, AUS would win easily on this wicket.
1) Cuz it's Indian bowling attack.how so? it will move a lot on this wicket through the air i reckon and even off the pitch..
at the Gabba the ball stays new for about 20 overs lol1) Cuz it's Indian bowling attack.
2) I'm not sure there will be much movement. Maybe with the new ball a bit, but not after that.
Let's just see. I think AUS will chase this total down, maybe 3-4 wickets down at most.
that is harsh.... imo ..the 20 over mark anyway196 to win by my maths. Unless overs are lost again now, in which case...
Australia left with 40 overs = 184 to win
35 overs = 170 to win
30 overs = 155 to win
25 overs = 137 to win
20 overs = 117 to win
Why is it harsh?that is harsh.... imo ..the 20 over mark anyway
117 is like 6 runs an over.. no team really would chase down 196 going at 6 an over at the 20 mark...Why is it harsh?