Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Youtube link0?@ the Backyard Cricket ad when they're picking teams. Girl just starts mouthing off at Clarkey, and in the background you hear Huss go "Good, good." Haha.
Youtube link0?@ the Backyard Cricket ad when they're picking teams. Girl just starts mouthing off at Clarkey, and in the background you hear Huss go "Good, good." Haha.
Warne's was pretty good when he could bowl it.Been good all day, too. Shame really.
Hogg's flipper really is the best I think I have EVER seen.
Youtube link?Post reported.
YES, THIS POST IS TANTAMOUNT TO INCEST!
But wouldn''t that also improves Bracken's chances, if you also tamper with the brakes of Shaun Tait's carNah.
Youtube link?
There's 4 of them, figured I'd link you to all of them in order.Youtube link0?
Shocking ads, tbh. I mean, I see where they are coming from but... just horrid lol must be laughed at.Youtube link0?
This is the funniest thing I've ever seen on CW.YES, THIS POST IS TANTAMOUNT TO INCEST!
Probably barge through Warnie's front door and find something similar...Youtube link?
He'll have 100 wickets by the end of 2008, IMO. Assuming he plays another 3-4 seasons (say 50 tests in the modern era), which is certainly not a stretch given his recent performances, and his relatively economical style and lack of a history of injuries, I don't think even 300 wickets is out of the question. Definitely I'd be stunned if he didn't take more than 100.At 32 I can't see Stuart Clark getting beyond a 100 Test wickets at most ...and even that may be stretching it...
Those are actually pretty good.There's 4 of them, figured I'd link you to all of them in order.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PLHsxU5EkBs
http://youtube.com/watch?v=g8SmSm9X-QU
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bDLavzcToWU
http://youtube.com/watch?v=tbB_61alThk
Best one is the rain one when Hayden gives it to Clarkey. Genuine lol everytime I see it.
It's hard for a pair of batsmen to go after him when none of them seem to know what he's doing. so far in this game he's bowled short of a length and moved it away before darting one back in occasionally (he did this on both LBW's). In conditions where he's doing nothing with the ball then maybe. But he's a bit like McGrath, even on wickets that don't offer a lot of help he usually moves it around even if its by the smallest amount.Ah thanks. Never saw Sarfraz bowl, but Clark seems quite a bit better.
I do wonder though what would happen if a pair of batsmen really went after him.
This is why technology should be used, but backward people living in 1878 are to afraid to do that.Haha. Bowden gives the one out that wasn't out.
Coming from the man holding a see-through umbrella(sp) is just as funny imo.Those are actually pretty good.
That "fake tan" comment made me smile.
I've heard a few comments about Clark's pace around the traps (and not suggesting you're making a fuss here, I just decided to reply to your post as it was close to the topic! ), and am a bit surprised at suggestions he's not very quick. Watching today he seemed to be mid to high 130's, which is more than quick enough to trouble batsmen if you're doing something with the ball.Similar bowling actions (stiff upper bodies) and running styles (little, pitty-patty steps)
As for the feet position, batsmen should obviously try to put the bowler off, particularly when they're as accurate as Clark, by changing position. However, he's 6' 6" and when facing bowlers of that height most have a tendency to go back if anything because they give the impression of bowling from 20 yards not 22.
He also appears quicker than the speed gun as he hits the bat very hard
Basically, they should try something different but it's easier said than done
I'm undecided on this issue. I can see the benefits of both tbh. Love that the umpire has the final say and love that he can make mistakes which adds another dimension to a game. However, I would not be opposed to technology being increased for decision making purposes. So, I'm not fussed either way, however I have no problem with what is currently happening.This is why technology should be used, but backward people living in 1878 are to afraid to do that.
AWTA.AFL needs to be changed to a rectangular game, or even better removed so they stop ruining cricket spectacles. Enough of drop in pitches IMO.
Until you've faced 130 on the bowling machine I don't think you can appreciate how tough it is to face someone bowling that fast. But then again, I'm not a test match batsman and not expected to score runs off someone bowling that quick.I've heard a few comments about Clark's pace around the traps (and not suggesting you're making a fuss here, I just decided to reply to your post as it was close to the topic! ), and am a bit surprised at suggestions he's not very quick. Watching today he seemed to be mid to high 130's, which is more than quick enough to trouble batsmen if you're doing something with the ball.