Athlai
Not Terrible
I know his batting is slow but he is more reliable than other options, the benefits in this case outweigh the risks.Athlai, the thing is with papps- you can't guarantee we will be 40/0, I know I'd take 60/2 over 40/2 anyday.
I know papps has acutally done well in the odi's he has played but in the long run his batting is too slow.
Because I'd rather McCullum to shepard our tail than go out all guns blazing at the start of the innings, though he probably is better than Cumming.Mccullum has under achieved with the bat at tests- he does what you say anyway most of time vs good bowling line ups he will just score a good looking 20 or 30 and get out. I'd he do it as an opener or no3, why would it be a disaster? didn't you see how well he handled the excellent england bowlers at no 3 in lords 04? He would certianly be better than craig cumming, I know that.
Agreed.And vincent is better as a middle order bat in tests, how showed that when he came back but was mysteriously dropped, i dont like him as an opener in tests but still would be a better choice than cumming.
The defining factor here is, Franklin has a better economy than Adams in ODI.You talk about Adams getting slaughtered but take a look at the odi stats and it shows Adams>> Franklin. i'm sick of people talking about how good franklin looked in one or 2 games when overall his odi record is probably the worst of any bowler who has played a reasonable number of games. People have been making excuses for him since 2004 when he bowled really well in one natwest game vs wi I think and keep talking about his potential . But stuff that, he has had plenty of chances in odi's and shown he is rubbish at it. Those are the facts, he turns in good performances and then backs it up with 3 or 4 shocking ones.
And that means Adam's is shockingly expensive for me.