• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in India

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
It is silly to send in Yuvraj in the second over. It doesn't matter if it was number four. It has to do with how many overs have been bowled.

Indians have been going crazy about he being allowed to bat at number three. He can and SHOULD bat at number three but NOT if we lose a wicket very early.

HE JUST CANT PLAY THE MOVING BALL EARLY.
 

pup11

International Coach
Tendulkar is looking in good touch today there is a lot more confidence in his footwork and shots, his balance at the crease also been pretty good today so these could be ominous signs for Aussies.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Tendulkar is looking in good touch today there is a lot more confidence in his footwork and shots, his balance at the crease also been pretty good today so these could be ominous signs for Aussies.
Yes but the biggest blow was losing Dravid. None of these young boys are anygood against the moving new ball.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
It is silly to send in Yuvraj in the second over. It doesn't matter if it was number four. It has to do with how many overs have been bowled.

Indians have been going crazy about he being allowed to bat at number three. He can and SHOULD bat at number three but NOT if we lose a wicket very early.

HE JUST CANT PLAY THE MOVING BALL EARLY.
Who would you have sent in? Uthappa?
 

Top