TheGreatAusie
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Pietersen gone to Chawla... came out, missed it, Dhoni deals with the stumps.
Because they can't rely on those 10 overs being quality, and they don't really need an extra batsman with Powar and Chawla at #7 and #8. Besides, there extra batsman would have either been a useless Gautam Gambhir or a young an inexperienced Rohit Sharma or Robin Uthappa.Why did India take 5 bowlers when they can get 10 out of Tendulkar/Yuvraj/ Ganguly and could have taken in an extra bat?
They're good enough for mine. It's one thing England going in with 5 as they have little realistic part time options besides Collingwood, but India have more than enough and chasing a big score with batting till Karthik at 6 is dodgy as. Would def have had Uthappa or Gambhir in there.Because they can't rely on those 10 overs being quality, and they don't really need an extra batsman with Powar and Chawla at #7 and #8. Besides, there extra batsman would have either been a useless Gautam Gambhir or a young an inexperienced Rohit Sharma or Robin Uthappa.
It was discussed not long after the 2nd ODI had finished and most people agreed that 5 bowlers was the best way to go, even more so if a half fit Munaf Patel was going to be bowling. It's one thing to perhaps get 10 overs out of Tendulkar/Ganguly/Yuvraj if one of your main bowlers is getting hammered, but to expect 10 quality overs is asking too much. I wouldn't mind seeing Uthappa or Sharma given a go, but the selectors seem hellbent on selecting Gambhir before those two. Also, Karthik should realistically be at #3 with Dhoni at #6.They're good enough for mine. It's one thing England going in with 5 as they have little realistic part time options besides Collingwood, but India have more than enough and chasing a big score with batting till Karthik at 6 is dodgy as. Would def have had Uthappa or Gambhir in there.
Damn fine if you're asking me.How is Chawla bowling?
Fun, Fun, Fun such a pity it ended so quickly.Chawla to Pietersen... should be fun to watch
AWTA, had a very good tour so far. Let's hope his bowling doesn't fall away in the next couple of years since he was introduced to international cricket at such a young age.Damn fine if you're asking me.
Who said they need to be quality overs though? As long as they do a job which they are all more than capable of it certainly good enough when the advantage is getting an extra bat in the side. You have three solid part timers there and I'd certainly be using them, imo.It was discussed not long after the 2nd ODI had finished and most people agreed that 5 bowlers was the best way to go, even more so if a half fit Munaf Patel was going to be bowling. It's one thing to perhaps get 10 overs out of Tendulkar/Ganguly/Yuvraj if one of your main bowlers is getting hammered, but to expect 10 quality overs is asking too much. I wouldn't mind seeing Uthappa or Sharma given a go, but the selectors seem hellbent on selecting Gambhir before those two. Also, Karthik should realistically be at #3 with Dhoni at #6.
Lot of forum members use it and I am still yet to decipher it, what does it mean (AWTA.)AWTA, had a very good tour so far. Let's hope his bowling doesn't fall away in the next couple of years since he was introduced to international cricket at such a young age.
Agree with the above. DWTA being the obvious opposite.Lot of forum members use it and I am still yet to decipher it, what does it mean (AWTA.)
I don't really see how 34 off 40 as opener is a failure. Nothing brilliant, but not bad.Wonder how much longer England have to suffer Prior who only scraped 30odd because the bowling was so poor. He's the new Geraint, awful shot selection and plays cross-batted shots at balls that aren't there for it and gets out for a brief cameo.
Get Mustard in ffs.