Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'd seriously doubt it. Think Murali's non-appearance down under can be traced to his lacking one of these:
Murali's team of lawyers getting started on their second letter of the week...
I'd seriously doubt it. Think Murali's non-appearance down under can be traced to his lacking one of these:
Raghav, What are yout thoughts on Chandra ?The article is 100% right.. If he has got deformity ask him to play in 'cricket for disables' and not at international level cheating
The article is 100% right.. If he has got deformity ask him to play in 'cricket for disables' and not at international level cheating
Subash chandra bose is a great freedom fighter. He fought hard for Indian freedomRaghav, What are yout thoughts on Chandra ?
Always a cheater....
He has been proved not to be a cheat, by the official rules of cricket he is legal, yet due to your pre-conceived ideas about him you will always ignore the fact that he doesn't cheat.
No, he's not, he's been adjudged to have a legal action, you have no grounds to call him a cheater apart from your own ill conceived and ignorant views.Always a cheater....
Dont dodge the question. You know it very well that I was talking about Bhagwat S. Chandrashekhar, legendry Indian legspinner.Subash chandra bose is a great freedom fighter. He fought hard for Indian freedom
Ignorance is Bliss .... I guess !The article is 100% right.. If he has got deformity ask him to play in 'cricket for disables' and not at international level cheating
I know it Sanz..Dont dodge the question. You know it very well that I was talking about Bhagwat S. Chandrashekhar, legendry Indian legspinner.
it is your ignorance to not to find that he is illegal bowlerNo, he's not, he's been adjudged to have a legal action, you have no grounds to call him a cheater apart from your own ill conceived and ignorant views.
Yup, considering your degree in bio-mechanics, I would certainly take your word over the scientists at university of western australia.it is your ignorance to not to find that he is illegal bowler
You would not think either of those things if you had watched them play liveLillee and Richards were streets ahead of most of their 70s compatriots in attitude, too, and that's why they were special players and are remembered so fondly, not because they had massive amounts of ability more than the rabble. IMO it's very possible to make a case for Greg Chappell > Richards and IMO it makes no sense not to argue that Marshall > Lillee.
Why? People argue a lot of things that are far more controversial than Marshall > Lillee.You would not think either of those things if you had watched them play live
Just my opinion tbh, if people had watched Chappell and Richards, I think they would rate Richards the better, even though Chappell finished with a higher ave. And the same with Lillee and Marshall.Why? People argue a lot of things that are far more controversial than Marshall > Lillee.
Was Ian Meckiff tested and cleared by biomechanic experts and still banned?Also on Murali, the very same argument was made for Ian Meckiff that he had a deformity or was unusual in that his elbow was double jointed, very different outcomes
No, his arm was bent which is unfair just like Murali. Biomechanics is a joke they are worse than Stats men imoWas Ian Meckiff tested and cleared by biomechanic experts and still banned?
Just because the technology wasn't available and one person might have been hard done by, that doesn't mean we should do the same thing again. That makes no sense.
Biomechanics is a joke
Judging by how easily optical illusions work on people i'll take the science thanks.No, his arm was bent which is unfair just like Murali. Biomechanics is a joke they are worse than Stats men imo
You listen to them, I will take my eye every time.
My last post on this subject as we go around in circles