Matt79
Hall of Fame Member
It's fairly obvious then that you have never faced Wes Hall.
Hey Sean - I don't think you're actually Richie Benaud at all!!!Up until this point did you actually think that I had...?
It's fairly obvious then that you have never faced Wes Hall.
Hey Sean - I don't think you're actually Richie Benaud at all!!!Up until this point did you actually think that I had...?
The selectors were told to ignore the previous test and just pick on their overall careers...leaving out the top scorer for them from the last test?
GreenidgeMighty long tail there mate.
And you know what I'm going to say but...I know what you're going to say, but:
Weekes average: 58
Richards average: 50
Just drop Sobers and play 4 bowlersThat's why I don't have Lara in my alltime Windies - on the face of it its ridiculous, but you've got a player with a record like Weekes, and then you've got a package like Viv, and they can't all fit!
Is every batsman with a Test average higher than 50.23 to be considered better than Viv?
Sobers is just ahead of Lara, Weekes, and probably Richards, purely as a batsman IMO though...Just drop Sobers and play 4 bowlers
Yeah, the middle order strength of the Windies is staggering, you could make a solid case to leave out ALL of the 3 Ws, which is just ridiculous. And for each one of them you put into the side, out goes a Headley, or a Lara, or a Richards - the only real lock is Sobers.That's why I don't have Lara in my alltime Windies - on the face of it its ridiculous, but you've got a player with a record like Weekes, and then you've got a package like Viv, and they can't all fit!
Well based on what occured during their great careers once Warne was fit & bowling at the his best he certainly was a challenging opponent to Lara.Don't see Warne being too much of a factor with Lara there, tbh.
I think Windies will just nudge above Australia, even with Bradman....
You're f*cking kidding me!Well, it isn't the All-Time Windies vs All-Time Aussies we've all be salivating for, but I got Virtual Cricket 4 working on my computer and this was, absolutely no kidding, the result of the first match I simmed, between my personal All-Time XI, and my All-Time 2nd XI. I'd say it would easily be the greatest match never played.
Sorry - they're thumbnails - I'm not tech-savvy enough to get them online so I can do the IMG tag thing to them.
Anyway, match had a bit of everything - a duck from Bradman in the first innings, with Hadlee and Murali getting amongst it, then Marshall ripping the guts out of the 2nd XI, despite staunch resistence from Keith Miller and Weekes, before a Bradman ton in the second dig gave the 2nd XI a total that was always going to be challenging... And the result?
Seems to me that the W's are getting more attention than they deserve on the basis of their surnames. Had they been different, they would garner less support.
Lol!Well, it isn't the All-Time Windies vs All-Time Aussies we've all be salivating for, but I got Virtual Cricket 4 working on my computer and this was, absolutely no kidding, the result of the first match I simmed, between my personal All-Time XI, and my All-Time 2nd XI. I'd say it would easily be the greatest match never played.
Sorry - they're thumbnails - I'm not tech-savvy enough to get them online so I can do the IMG tag thing to them.
Anyway, match had a bit of everything - a duck from Bradman in the first innings, with Hadlee and Murali getting amongst it, then Marshall ripping the guts out of the 2nd XI, despite staunch resistence from Keith Miller and Weekes, before a Bradman ton in the second dig gave the 2nd XI a total that was always going to be challenging... And the result?
challenging yes, but I have never really seen Lara having too much trouble with Warne or any other spinner for that matter......Well based on what occured during their great careers once Warne was fit & bowling at the his best he certainly was a challenging opponent to Lara.