I seriously hope that was in jest?.No Younis Kahn?
That's different - we know for certain Tendulkar is a good middle-order player and he has played that role very well.No, but I would be quite wary to take someone away from a position where he scored 37 centuries from 269 matches, compared to 4 centuries from 119 matches in the middle order.
It is possible that he could be as successful, but why mess with what works? It's like moving Bradman away from #3. Yea, I'm sure he could be a good opener, but why?
I'd happily have Bevan batting at three in any ODI team of mine.Wanted to get KP in there, but you have to kill heroes in an exercise like this. So Ricky Ponting, Brian Lara, and to finish the match off, Michael "the finisher" Bevan.
I'd happily have Bevan batting at three in any ODI team of mine.
some would say he's always been like that.Your arguments of late have been very weird.
Miandad
Deano
Bevan
(almost went for Inzy but decided his running would not take with Deano and/or Bevan)
Same three for me. Deano, Inzaman, Miandad all dead unlucky.Ponting
Lara
Bevan
Stop being a ****ing baby, if you don't like the idea of voting on a poll then don't ****ing look/commet on it, simple as, with no need to start another pointless and pedantic argument in yet another thread.So? That doesn't mean he can't be of more use - especially to a multi-team XI - in the middle.