You do realise that the picture I posted was of Kiran More, not Peter Moores?1. He looks better with lighter hair.
2. He looks better in lighter conditions.
3. I never said he was a glamour - just better than Dunc.
4. This conversation has gone on long enough - it'll start to look pretty suss soon.
Not really a surprise they did, with one bowler injured and another bowling crap. Thank god for Monty - and to think there was stories that with Flintoff injured we'd play four seamers. As for the game the Windies don't have a Warne to give us the heebie-geebies, so the only way this will be a result is if we declare say 350 ahead and Harmison suddenly turns the clock back to 2004. But I think this will be like the Pakistan Test on this ground last year - Struass will play safe so we won't have time to bowl Windies out. A draw.
Ahh, right. Makes sense then, given he seemed to look nothing like Moores.
Was a bit bemused ITBT, but assumed it was just bad lighting and a hair die. Indian logos everywhere should have tipped me off though.
Take a stick to yourself ladAhh, right. Makes sense then, given he seemed to look nothing like Moores.
*hangs head in shame*
He's already out.
Haha, what poor timing.
If Vaughan plays, he'll definitely be captain.gettingbetter said:
IMO, if Flintoff isn'f fit/confident enough to play as part of a four man attack, he shouldn't be playing at all as his batting isn't good enough. He'll play anyway though, in which case I reckon Strauss could get the chop. His captaincy is irrelevant given he won't be captain, as Vaughan will be back.gettingbetter said:
Not saying it is, but I doubt England want to go into the game with 5 specialist batsman and Matthew Prior batting at #6. This would be the scenario if you went with 5 specialist bowlers (I don't think Flintoff will make the 2nd Test). Considering that one of those batsman would be Michael Vaughan, who has very little form behind him, it would be a huge risk.