Kumble has been a world-class spinner for the past decade without turning too many balls ...About time he quit, what is the point of a leggy who can't even turn the ball?
Much more often than you ask this question, you should look at Stuart McGill ( ie, i get-owned-vs-good-spin-playing-teams) and ask " what is the point of a leggie who can't land two consecutive balls on the same square foot on the pitch ?"bout time he quit, what is the point of a leggy who can't even turn the ball?
Oh, he was. For ages. Just that that was rather a long time ago, now. But he was a fabulous ODI bowler up to WC99.Never a great ODI bowler, but an Indian legend nevertheless.
He never retired, but he's only ever been a bit-part ODI player for the last 3 years or so.Didn't Kumble retire 2 years ago from odi cricket, it was just a formality to take him to his last WC just as a token of respect towards him.
Not just good spin-playing teams at all - MacGill's done little of note in his entire career except have the odd sensational Test here and there (and occasionally 2 in a row).Stuart McGill ( ie, i get-owned-vs-good-spin-playing-teams)
He certainly did. But his Googly and his Leg-Break turned on a decent pitch that offered a bit to the spinners. He just didn't bowl them all that often.not doubting he has taken hundreds of wickets or the fact that he was a good player, but he never turned a ball.
The point would be to take wickets. Which he did.About time he quit, what is the point of a leggy who can't even turn the ball?
Hogg's no better than MacGill, TBH. Both are actually pretty good at the variations, but neither are that accurate. Hogg more so than MacGill, of course, but still neither have terribly notable Test records.yeah macgill is pants!! Hogg is class, he causes decent players problems rather often and poor players (england) struggle against him with hi smixture of wrong'uns and standard chinaman stuff!
Almost exclusively on spin-receptive pitches, though.The point would be to take wickets. Which he did.
Which is more than the non-Warne/Murali spinners over the past decade or so.Not just good spin-playing teams at all - MacGill's done little of note in his entire career except have the odd sensational Test here and there (and occasionally 2 in a row).
Exactly.For all MacGill's supposed faults he has an excellent record that not to many other spinners have.He's just been very unlucky that Warne was Australia's premier spinner and the fact that Warne and MacGill didn't play much together.Which is more than the non-Warne/Murali spinners over the past decade or so.
Very true. But still better than most (non Murali-Warne) spinners of the era.Almost exclusively on spin-receptive pitches, though.