• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Group C - New Zealand, England, Kenya, Canada

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Economy rate 3.88 in this cup
And what about the CB series? :p

Seriously though, I'm not going to sit here and bag Oram's bowling, because I've always rated him as an ODI bowler.

I really don't care if he scores 35 not out against Canada or not, but his innings against England was quality I'll admit. He's looking more like a genuine #6 every innings - he still has to keep it going for longer than two series though...
 

Blaze

Banned
Did anyone see Vincent's century? fmd it was garbage. He looked like he was going to get out every ball. It really tears me up inside to see a complete 'tard like him in the side who has nfi what he's doing, but pulls out the occasional minnow bash.

Vettori needs to play Australia or possibly Sri Lanka quick smart, before everyone realises he's crap again.
*aggres*

Vincent is rubbish on anything but flat hard tracks. Always has been, always will be.
 

Fiery

Banned
And what about the CB series? :p

Seriously though, I'm not going to sit here and bag Oram's bowling, because I've always rated him as an ODI bowler.

I really don't care if he scores 35 not out against Canada or not, but his innings against England was quality I'll admit. He's looking more like a genuine #6 every innings - he still has to keep it going for longer than two series though...
Good to hear he's slowly swaying your opinion mate
 

thierry henry

International Coach
16tos, your points are duly noted. Probably I am being unduly harsh on Vettori because (seemingly unlike everyone else in the world) I just don't enjoy his bowling much. In particular, I am falling in to the trap of criticising his ODI bowling because I think he's a pretty rubbish test bowler. While the averages are obviously similar, I will concede that (a) his economy in ODIs is very good, and (b) he has actually been improving in ODIs, unlike in tests.

Re: Vincent, I think Blaze is probably right. I think it'd be fair to say Lou has his uses on the hard, fast tracks. He's pretty much at the extreme end of the modern day, drive on the up, flat track bully batsman. Honestly, no matter how many times I watch him bat, I can't shake the notion that he has no idea what he's doing. I think his moderate domestic record and the first 65 or so games of his ODI career underline this point. Nevertheless, he has proven useful as an opening bat on favourable wickets. I would actually keep him in the team at the moment as long as he doesn't pretend to be a proper batsman. He is a useful hard track slogger, I admit.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Long for mine.

A few good games in the CBS does not offset an entire career of utter mediocrity. Vincent has a hell of a lot to do before he gets on an even footing in ODI cricket.
Exactly.

Vincent was just about the worst middle order batsman going in international ODI cricket for the best part of 60 or 70 matches. He's found better success as a reckless slogger at the top of the order. Still a way to go before he proves anything much.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
He has to pretend to be a proper batsman and play proper cricket shots or he's more likely to get out
I've never seen Vincent succeed by playing normal cricket.

A "good" Lou Vincent innings is driving aerially on the up, paddle sweeps off the seamers, and numerous plays and misses outside off stump. If he trys to play "properly" he just ends up getting to 15 off 40 balls, or something like that, and then getting out- see the first 60 games of his career.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
16tos, your points are duly noted. Probably I am being unduly harsh on Vettori because (seemingly unlike everyone else in the world) I just don't enjoy his bowling much. In particular, I am falling in to the trap of criticising his ODI bowling because I think he's a pretty rubbish test bowler. While the averages are obviously similar, I will concede that (a) his economy in ODIs is very good, and (b) he has actually been improving in ODIs, unlike in tests.

Re: Vincent, I think Blaze is probably right. I think it'd be fair to say Lou has his uses on the hard, fast tracks. He's pretty much at the extreme end of the modern day, drive on the up, flat track bully batsman. Honestly, no matter how many times I watch him bat, I can't shake the notion that he has no idea what he's doing. I think his moderate domestic record and the first 65 or so games of his ODI career underline this point. Nevertheless, he has proven useful as an opening bat on favourable wickets. I would actually keep him in the team at the moment as long as he doesn't pretend to be a proper batsman. He is a useful hard track slogger, I admit.
I wouldn't really say he's a flat track bully - I think he'd succeed reasonably well on a pitch with a decent amount of seam movement as long as the bounce was consistent and the pitch was a fast one. Slow wickets, even of the flat variety, I can see him struggling on.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I've never seen Vincent succeed by playing normal cricket.

A "good" Lou Vincent innings is driving aerially on the up, paddle sweeps off the seamers, and numerous plays and misses outside off stump. If he trys to play "properly" he just ends up getting to 15 off 40 balls, or something like that, and then getting out- see the first 60 games of his career.
He played properly during the CB series, IMO. Possibly a little more aggressive than your average batsman, but it was still batsmanship.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
He played properly during the CB series, IMO. Possibly a little more aggressive than your average batsman, but it was still batsmanship.
Just flat out disagree tbh. An agree to disagree situation, I suppose. For starters, he hardly plays any normal front foot shots along the ground. When he drives, he tries to hit it for 6 90% of the time. Secondly, it seems to me that a lot of his shots are predetermined. He plays the pull shot, maybe, and if he gets a real rank short and wide ball, he cuts. But apart from that I see him as a player who predetermines his shots, doesn't know how to pace an innings, and generally resorts to trying to hit over the infield.
 

Fiery

Banned
Just flat out disagree tbh. An agree to disagree situation, I suppose. For starters, he hardly plays any normal front foot shots along the ground. When he drives, he tries to hit it for 6 90% of the time. Secondly, it seems to me that a lot of his shots are predetermined. He plays the pull shot, maybe, and if he gets a real rank short and wide ball, he cuts. But apart from that I see him as a player who predetermines his shots, doesn't know how to pace an innings, and generally resorts to trying to hit over the infield.
Well it seems to be working for him of late so if it ain't broke don't fix it...(which I suppose is what you're saying ultimately)
 

meatspx

U19 Cricketer
Sometimes I get the feeling that Vincent does try and 'wing it' alot of the times, often riding his luck & playing checky predetermined shots.

But he has proven himself over the summer with some mature innings and I'm picking him to continue to average around 35 with the bat this world cup (which is good for a NZer). Plus he's handy in the field like Marshall as said before!!
 

Top