As for test matches I agree that Bangladesh have still did not get to that level to compete regularly with the top countries.
Football and tennis analogies are NOT appropriate. Cricket is a different game, totally.Not all teams are equal. Otherwise Rodger Federer and Vincent Spadea wont be playing in the same tour and Man U and Man City won't be playing in the same league. For the last 2 years Bangladesh have been winning enough matches in limited overs matches.
As for test matches I agree that Bangladesh have still did not get to that level to compete regularly with the top countries.
There's usually some progress there - until it becomes progress to a certain level (ie being able to compete with other teams) they don't deserve the status.I am not looking at the results..i am looking at the progress and there is certainly some progress there..
It's just complete straw-clutching and from certain types I'd expect little else.Will people stop including WC warm up games in these comparisons.
Its enough to drive anyone crazy.
Also, Twenty/20 games should not be in ODI comparisons.
There is more to it than this.Being successful in ODIs won't be bringing success in the longer version of the game too. Bangladesh would never be able to compete at test level until their first class cricket structure is strengthed. A country where club cricket is still preferred over first class cricket cannot expect to do well so easily in test matches.You also have to consider that Bangladesh did not play any test match in last one year, when they were on pick of form.
That's according to you and to the best of my knowledge not the majority of sports loving people. To most sports loving person, a sporting meet needs both 'Man U and Man City', 'Alonso and Kubica', 'Federer and Spadea', Sri lanka and Bangladesh', unless ofcourse you believe in a elitist society.Football and tennis analogies are NOT appropriate.
Not that it will never change.Slavery did go when southern forces were defeated but the mentality of some of those Southerns took time to change. Time is what is needed for these types to change, so dont worry about it mate.It was never been.
Comparing domestic to international is not 100% accurate in any case.That's according to you and to the best of my knowledge not the majority of sports loving people. To most sports loving person, a sporting meet needs both 'Man U and Man City', 'Alonso and Kubica', 'Federer and Spadea', Sri lanka and Bangladesh', unless ofcourse you believe in a elitist society.
People having similar mentality are also conspiring to destroy the Premier League by making plans to launch the European Super League. But these kind of elitist hopefully will never prevail and Wigan and Bangladeshi players will continue to add to the charm of premiership and ODIs respectively.
Big,brave call mate.I wouldn't liked to have been the one to make that statementMashrafe Mortaza will be better then Chaminda Vaas IMO, his a lot more then handy.
Camberwell Magpies bowling coach...Richard said:Hmm, Ravi Ratnayeke and the like tend to strike me as being better than the Shahadat Hossains and the like of this World, if only by a bit...