Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
You'll forgive me I'm unconvinced.Yup.
You'll forgive me I'm unconvinced.Yup.
One of my best mates is from Pakistan, i am not predudice against against Pakistanis, nor do i judge people by the colour of their skin, the country they come from, or the religion they follow.You'll forgive me I'm unconvinced.
So?This person is arguing about Pakistani cricket on a cricket forum where you have been particularly vindictive towards that cricket team in the not-too-distant-past.
Ok.It was nothing of the sort - it was to do with prejudice against a cricket team (and it's fans).
Where's the fun in that?But why?
Why flame-bait when you're bored?
Why not do as I do, and search for threads to dig and old ground to go over?
Because there are more Pakistan players there you idiot.
What a pathetic postOk.
I am not prejudice against Pakistan nor their fans, i'm just a bored flame bater.
would just like to say my comment was made with my tongue firmly in my cheekI'm starting to see what you mean, Fusion.
Err... well... it's... ... fun.Where's the fun in that?
1. I havent been here for a while and so , no, I wasnt aware that there was a huge problem with this recent.It doesn't matter how it was made - you know perfectly well that such comments have been being made with a ridiculous monotony of late, and contributing or appearing to contribute is just totally unneccessary.
It is very simple and Ill go though it very slowly.How come SA is uperior? if you add up all the South Africans it comes upto cumalitive144% and if you add up all the Pakistanis in that list it comes up to 166%.
from your calc, you can say that Polluck is better than Wasim or Waqar when defending under 200, however if you take how the teams performed, Pakistan is better
point taken. But Pakistan has done it in more occasions than SA. Its just Pakistan gets out under 200 ways too many timeIt is very simple and Ill go though it very slowly.
South Africa win more of their games when they are defending a total of less than 200 compared to Pakistan.
All of the SA players mentioned were more likely to be involved in a victory when defending less than 200 than all of the Pakistanis listed.
Cold hard facts based on the figures you provided I afraid. Its an open and shut case.
I hope you dont think I was getting at you, it was just that the figures you provided didnt back up your case and I was just pointing it out. From your figures SA were more likely to defend <200. However, I do agree with you to an extent, there is no doubt that Pakistan can be a very dangerous team and can defend anything when they get everything rightpoint taken. But Pakistan has done it in more occasions than SA. Its just Pakistan gets out under 200 ways too many time
Same, i'm not that silly to think that ALL Pakistan players a dirty filthy cheats.would just like to say my comment was made with my tongue firmly in my cheek
I don't know how much you've been reading of late but there's been a very, very definate pattern (and one that's justifiably pissed-off considerably the Pakistani contingent here) of non-stop, monotonous, over-and-over snide comments along the "Pakistan are a bunch of constantly-cheating scumbags" lines. I haven't even experienced 1\10th of it, BTSOT, and I'm sick of it already (and so are the likes of Jono, adhar and pasag). As a result of that, I replied scathingly. There's nothing wrong with the odd jibe-back when someone makes a thread-starting comment of the type you allude to but when it's a repetition of stuff that's been done ad nauseum for the last God-knows-how-long, it starts to seriously piss people off, especially those who are on the receiving-end.1. I havent been here for a while and so , no, I wasnt aware that there was a huge problem with this recent.
My comment was a jokey reference to this : 3 OF THOSE 5 BOWLERS IN THE LIST ARE SPINNERS WHO WONT GET ANYTHING FROM TEMPERING
The oportunity was there for a cheap laugh and I took it. Do we really have to get to a point where we are afraid of maybe putting someones nose out of joint when they are bigging up their team. Did the original poster really expect everyone to bow down and all bathe in the glory of Pakistans success at defending small totals. If he did , maybe he was being slightly naive.
lets face it, probably most of the time when someone posts some sort of interesting fact about the team they support that suggests that there is some aspect of superiority in his/hers team over other teams Like this one did), it is to , in some way, rub the noses in it of the readers of the thread who dont support that team. What reaction is expected....yep you guessed, you will get people who will question it, rightly or wrongly, it will happen.
Does this mean then starting a thread like this is baiting or whatever the word is (still not really up on all this web talk )...No, despite the fact that the guy was trying to imply Pakistans superiorlity over others in this particular situation.
If Open 365 wants to say what he said, then he should be allowed to say it. Its his opinion, and he was in fact making what he would consider a logical arguement to the initial posting.
Err, I have against EXD that he's a cretinous ****, frankly. And I see no reason why I'm in the wrong for referring to him as EXD when he started the whole thing with his "Motson" nonsense. EXD is generally widely disliked around these parts - I'm astounded if you've missed that (or maybe you just don't talk to people off the forum). It's a pretty tolerant crowd, all-in-all, though (and yes, I've benefited from that of times), and so he's never been ostracised the way he might. But, with his ignore-list being probably about 4 times larger than the rest of the forum put together, he does his best to help himself along the way.I dont agree with this ganging up mentality that in fact you would appear to encouraging in this thread, and also the ridiculous EXD or what ever it is thing you have against Scaly and I think a few others.
That's arrant nonsense and you might know it if you hadn't been absent for such a while.lets not get all high and mighty about me making one jokey comment when in fact you probably wind more people up on this forum than anyone else (which again, is your right, and so i dont have aproblem with it)