Dick Rockett
International Vice-Captain
That, and apparently he has had a poor attitude in the past.Tim said:I have no idea why they aren't giving Ryder a crack. There must be something holding him back...perhaps his fitness?
That, and apparently he has had a poor attitude in the past.Tim said:I have no idea why they aren't giving Ryder a crack. There must be something holding him back...perhaps his fitness?
Maybe he's in for his fielding?Natman20 said:James Marshalls selection came out of the blue. He has not even performed at first class level and shouldn't have got anywhere near selection no matter what fromat the game is being played. I don't know what is wrong with the New Zealand selectors not to give some of the new PROMISING players a go. What will James Marshall do? He would be a burden on the team. At least it is only the Twenty20s which I dont really care that much about.
Only just noticed thisBracewell must think James is better with his hands than Hamish.
Doubt they will give Rob Nicol or Neil Broom a game at this stage, same applies with Neil Parlane but if they start scoring heaps of runs then they are definite candidates. Ross Taylor doesn't have the greatest FC record and should probably only be an ODI player at this stage, with Vincent being the #5 in Tests. Seeing as how Braces is unwilling to give Jesse Ryder a crack, How has already been tested but too inexperienced and Cumming in excellent touch but only a short term option then Lou Vincent will probably open in ODI's, which I personally am not to happy about.With the retirement of Nath Astle, I think we should discuss his possible long term replacements.
ODI's (opening batsman)
Vincent
Ryder
Cumming
How
Tests (middle order batsman)
Vincent
Taylor
Broom
Nicol
N Parlane
Vincent seems the logical chocie for both forms. An ideal 4/5 in tests and can hit over the top in ODI's but his ODI form is usually patchy. So maybe someone like Ryder for ODI's?
Name Mat I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St Team
MD Bell 4 6 1 383 161* 76.60 46.76 2 1 7 - WELL
[B]NT Broom 4 5 1 366 112 91.50 62.24 1 3 2 - OTAGO[/B]
HJH Marshall 4 8 1 353 153 50.42 59.72 1 1 1 - ND
GEF Barnett 4 8 1 351 118 50.14 57.44 1 2 2 - CD
[B]RL Taylor 4 7 0 348 217 49.71 82.85 1 - 4 - CD[/B]
BBJ Griggs 4 7 1 344 83 57.33 48.31 - 4 10 - CD
ME Parlane 4 7 1 337 140 56.16 49.77 1 3 6 - WELL
PJ Ingram 2 4 1 331 166* 110.33 54.08 2 - - - CD
GR Todd 4 6 1 328 160 65.60 57.74 1 1 - - OTAGO
[B]TG McIntosh 4 8 1 314 205 44.85 49.21 1 1 1 - AUCK[/B]
GJ Hopkins 4 4 3 307 139* 307.00 57.49 2 - 7 1 OTAGO
CD McMillan 4 6 1 301 117 60.20 51.62 2 - 2 - CANT
GR Hay 4 6 1 284 98* 56.80 56.34 - 3 1 - CD
[B]JD Ryder 4 7 1 272 77 45.33 75.55 - 2 4 - WELL
RJ Nicol 4 6 1 271 160 54.20 41.37 1 1 3 - AUCK[/B]
RA Jones 4 8 1 271 62 38.71 51.22 - 3 2 - AUCK
CZ Harris 4 6 2 270 122 67.50 47.78 1 1 12 - CANT
PG Fulton 4 7 1 270 68 45.00 50.09 - 2 1 - CANT
JAH Marshall 4 8 0 267 128 33.37 56.92 1 1 2 - ND
AR Adams 3 6 2 253 117* 63.25 101.20 1 1 1 - AUCK
DL Vettori 2 3 1 246 120* 123.00 76.39 1 1 3 - ND
NR Parlane 4 6 1 205 89 41.00 47.45 - 2 2 - WELL
Name Mat I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St Team
[B]CD Cumming 9 9 1 394 112 49.25 81.40 2 - 3 - OTAGO
PD McGlashan 8 8 2 380 87 63.33 80.16 - 4 9 2 ND[/B]
CZ Harris 8 8 3 324 71 64.80 79.02 - 3 9 - CANT
AJ Redmond 9 9 0 308 67 34.22 71.46 - 3 1 - OTAGO
AW Evans 9 9 0 297 79 33.00 60.36 - 2 2 - ND
RA Jones 7 7 0 294 81 42.00 80.76 - 3 4 - AUCK
ME Parlane 8 8 2 288 132 48.00 95.36 1 1 2 - WELL
PJ Ingram 7 7 1 283 104 47.16 76.69 1 1 1 - CD
[B]JM How 7 7 1 278 93 46.33 72.02 - 2 6 - CD[/B]
L Vincent 7 7 0 273 129 39.00 86.39 1 1 2 - AUCK
[B]NT Broom 9 9 1 267 87 33.37 69.17 - 2 3 - OTAGO[/B]
CFK van Wyk 8 8 6 260 85* 130.00 85.24 - 2 3 3 CANT
GR Todd 9 8 0 259 53 32.37 65.90 - 1 4 - OTAGO
JAH Marshall 5 5 2 257 152* 85.66 94.83 1 1 3 - ND
GD Elliott 8 5 1 256 107* 64.00 91.10 1 2 3 - WELL
MS Sinclair 7 6 1 250 79* 50.00 75.75 - 3 2 - CD
[B]MHW Papps 8 8 0 221 62 27.62 68.00 - 2 1 - CANT[/B]
SL Stewart 8 8 0 212 73 26.50 57.14 - 1 - - CANT
So essentially Boock is saying that simply fielding a stable lineup of New Zealand's 11 or so best players for more than one game is vindication for John Bracewell? That returning players like Oram, Vincent, Mills and Styris wasn't an entirely obvious way to improve the team's performance and that indeed, the subsequent improvement wasn't entirely predictable?Richard Boock said:Cricket: All right, we were wrong about the formerly Unwatchables
In common with other newspapers, we may have been guilty of suggesting that John Bracewell was not quite the next Albert Einstein, and that his selection policies appeared to have been designed by a bunch of Alzheimer's victims.
To be honest, this assessment was based mostly on the proceedings during the earlier series against Sri Lanka and at no stage took into account the unlikely scenario that Bracewell might have been correct, or that the New Zealand team might improve.
It wasn't until the under-fire squad arrived in Perth, strung together back-to-back 300-plus totals and all but wrapped up their place in the tri-series finals, that "we" were fully able to appreciate the error of our ways and determine a better course of action.
So, with caps in hand we now unreservedly withdraw the Operation Screwloose allegation and publicly concede that Bracewell probably had a point when he argued for greater squad development, even if it did mean getting bowled out for 73 along the way.
Furthermore, rather than doubt New Zealand's chances in the tri-series and World Cup, we now acknowledge that Bracewell's squad is shaping up as a serious contender in both competitions, and could yet be on the cusp of celebrating a historic season.
Certainly, the way Jacob Oram has exploded back into action on the ODI scene, and the manner in which Lou Vincent has taken his chances augurs well for a team that's already qualified for four World Cup semifinals, and is desperate to go a step further in the Caribbean.
While we were scoffing and dissolving in laughter over Bracewell's much-maligned rotation policy, the New Zealand team were witnessing the emergence of blossoming paceman Mark Gillespie, managing the fitness of Shane Bond, and finding out vital information about the form of Nathan Astle.
Players such as Michael Mason and Jeetan Patel were afforded valuable game time, Daniel Vettori was primed as a replacement skipper and cover for Stephen Fleming, and injured front-liners such as Oram, Scott Styris and Kyle Mills were given time to make full recoveries.
Bracewell insisted he was on the right track, but for a while there - all we could see was a sightly irritated man wandering around in the thick undergrowth with no clue where he was, and no idea how to find his way out.
How wrong could we have been.
It all came to a head over the past few days when New Zealand - courtesy of Oram and Vincent - set alight an initially turgid tri-series, woke up Australia with a thrilling run-chase at the Waca, steamrollered England and moved within one win of cementing a finals' berth.
With Styris now in Melbourne after recovering from his calf injury and Mills likely to make swift progress with every outing, New Zealand have transformed from being the "unwatchables" to being compulsory viewing every time they take the field.
And another concession: Bracewell was probably right to send Brendon McCullum back to No 7 before the halfway point of the series, even though we kept banging on about the need to give the little gloveman longer in the opening position.
Since then, McCullum's featured in a match-winning stand at Adelaide while ensuring his team took the points against England, and was even more impressive against Australia on Sunday, when he played a magnificent foil for Oram.
So it's time to say that we were wrong; that it's become evident that Bracewell is neither crackers nor bonkers.
You never know, if he keeps on like this, we may even start believing him about Astle's retirement decision.
Selecting Michael Parlane would be a backwards step now I believe. He was only mentioned before as a band-aid solution to NZ's top order for the 2 test against Sri Lanka.
Neil Broom is a player who could well make the step up for NZ in the next 2 or 3 years as he has been very consistent for Otago in the middle order.
He has been a key cog for Otago who are enjoying a fair bit of limited-overs sucess this season. Needs to build on it for next season aswell.Neil Broom is a player who could well make the step up for NZ in the next 2 or 3 years as he has been very consistent for Otago in the middle order.
According to the Future Tours Program we are going to South Africa in November 2007 for 2 Test's and 5 ODI's, then the CH in Australia. England are coming here for 3 Test's and 5 ODI's during February and March 2008. From after the conclusion of the World Cup through to April 2008 we are scheduled to play 5 Test's and 13 ODI's, Zimbabwe and Bangladesh are both scheduled for 6 Test's while India and Pakistan have 15. We then play a return series in England in May 2008.Has our next test series even been confirmed? According to Cricinfo the only confirmed fixtures for us in the next 2 years are the CH series and the World Cup.