The Shiv should definitely get it.Hats off to Chanderpaul; one of the great ODI innings. No way he deserved to lose. MotM might be interesting.
Shiv opened so I'll give it to him.Shiv's 149 today against Inzamam's 122 (?) against India almost three years ago?
They have the golf on, live. They tend to avoid showing the same sport on two channels, especially when they have other live sporting events which they can cover, and the test series in South Africa is on.Amazing match it seems, one wonders why Foxtel showed whatever crap it shows on the third sports channel and not this.
Most Indian umpires are very poor.. It has mostly to do with the problems ailing the development of umpires in our country due to neglect by the BCCI.Looks like we have an Asad Rauf of our own. Can you be any more clueless?
Hope Bravo's fine.
That was one of the most exciting one day games. I didn't watch the game but this can't be any where close to that game (which I know you are not saying). The Chanders inning may have reminded you of that game..Phew, that reminds me of 1st ODI vs. Pakistan 2004.
Even the best of bowlers get belted on many of the dead surfaces ODIs are played on these days. I think on those surfaces, batting and pacing of a chase are far more crucial than bowling, because those pitches tend to equalize bowlers and an Ambrose can go for 70+ all the same as a Dwayne Smith.This game does show how crucial it will be for the team that wins the world cup to have very good bowlers. On flatter tracks, quite a few teams will be able to make a lot of runs. However, not many teams will have the bowlers who can prevent that - particularly by taking wickets on the dead wickets.
My point was more to stress on the importance of taking wickets in high run scoring matches. Chasing and pacing are crucial on dead pitches but even more crucial is a bowler who can be effective even on dead pitches. A Wasim Akram who could make the ball talk on the deadest of pitches would be invaluable to a one day side and could be the difference between two teams who have superb batsmen.Even the best of bowlers get belted on many of the dead surfaces ODIs are played on these days. I think on those surfaces, batting and pacing of a chase are far more crucial than bowling, because those pitches tend to equalize bowlers and an Ambrose can go for 70+ all the same as a Dwayne Smith.
Wasim Akram is a once in a lifetime bowler though. As in, Pakistan would do exceptionally well to find a bowler as great in my lifetime. It's also worth noting that Wasim retired in 2003 and flat wickets have gotten even flatter since then, as evidenced by the Aus-NZ series a year and some back and the Aus-SA epic.My point was more to stress on the importance of taking wickets in high run scoring matches. Chasing and pacing are crucial on dead pitches but even more crucial is a bowler who can be effective even on dead pitches. A Wasim Akram who could make the ball talk on the deadest of pitches would be invaluable to a one day side and could be the difference between two teams who have superb batsmen.