aussie
Hall of Fame Member
and the Great Sachin Tendulkar will finally get to face a top quality English attack in home conditions.adharcric said:We're touring England a few months after the World Cup.
and the Great Sachin Tendulkar will finally get to face a top quality English attack in home conditions.adharcric said:We're touring England a few months after the World Cup.
It will hardly be English attack at its best vs Tendulkar at his best. That time ended about five years ago. Plus, is Jones ever coming back from injury? He was such a huge part of that attack.aussie said:and the Great Sachin Tendulkar will finally get to face a top quality English attack in home conditions.
Or still even playing.Mr Mxyzptlk said:It also can't be taken for granted that Tendulkar will be fit for the game.
A considerable one, both mentally and physically he is much older than his birth certificate suggests.PhoenixFire said:What difference does it make?
But the fact of the matter is that he is now nowhere near as effective as he was 4 years ago.Pratyush said:Yes the body does not remain the same. However, it is not necessary that it means a player will become poorer. Courtney Walsh played 16 years of test cricket and he had great years at the end. He moulded his game. Also, a fast bowler's body takes a lot more toll than a batsman's. We cannot say because player x has played so many years, his game will necessarily deteriorate. The game of a player changes over the years but it is not the same thing to 'it has become worse'.
Blocks for 20 overs then plays a rash shot and is dismissed in single figures?silentstriker said:You know, a fusion of Virender Sehwag and Akash Chopra might just be the perfect batsman.
He'll get into the 20s and get the ball older. It could work.marc71178 said:Blocks for 20 overs then plays a rash shot and is dismissed in single figures?
That would be great, actually. OUr problem is that the middle order - already out of form - is being exposed to the new ball. As both the lower orders have shown, you can bat if the ball is old, so 20 overs for no wickets - I'll take that every time.marc71178 said:Blocks for 20 overs then plays a rash shot and is dismissed in single figures?
Turbinator said:Or it could be he plays a rash shot then waits patiently in the dressing room...
Yuvraj hasn't proven much in test cricket apart from two or three classy knocks when everyone else capitulated, but he deserves more chances because of the maturity he's shown in one-day cricket of late. I'm quite confident he'll be a mainstay in our test side for years to come.silentstriker said:Yuvraj and Kaif are not test standard players, in my opinion.
Would be a good idea if his fingers aren't up to it, he batted very well I thought and showed great maturity until he was dismissed to a loose shot. Karthik has promise and this could be the chance to show it on the international stage.adharcric said:There's a decent chance that Dinesh Karthik will don the gloves at Cape Town. This could be the chance that Karthik has desperately been waiting for.
Dhoni had a good test overall at Durban, but he took several blows on the fingers and resting him may be the wiser option with a quality reserve waiting in the wings.
who would he displace down the order assuming that gambhir would open?Turbinator said:^^ That's what the Indian team is, most likely, going to look like, considering the fact that my wish to put Sehwag down the order won't come true.
Few things would make it worse, and this would be one of them.Turbinator said:I know this sounds ridiculous, but I've said this time and again and people have written it off, but dropping Sehwag and opening the batting with either Dhoni or Ganguly isn't as bad as it seems. I mean it can't get any worse.