• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in South Africa

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
IMO opening is a specialists job. Sehwag is not an opener by trade, but by now he is. He should open or be dropped, pretty much.
 

adharcric

International Coach
It can't get any worse, but do we really want to stay where we are right now? No. Dhoni would do better than most think as an opener, but seriously no. Ganguly, seriously no.
Sehwag should not be anywhere close to the XI at Cape Town. As SS said, he can open or he can sit out. He's not replacing anyone in the middle-order. That's all.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Turbinator said:
I don't know, but to me Gambhir and Jaffer are both been there done that.
Neither has done poorly. They are the two best specialist openers in India right now. Period.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Turbinator said:
I know this sounds ridiculous, but I've said this time and again and people have written it off, but dropping Sehwag and opening the batting with either Dhoni or Ganguly isn't as bad as it seems. I mean it can't get any worse.

I would prefer Dhoni, he has shown maturity, and he will step up if given the oppurtunity.
is there any long-term purpose to this or no other reason than "it can't get any worse"?

1. dhoni and even ganguly are doing decently where they are right now, you'd be screwing with that....

2. there's absolutely no guarantee that sehwag in his current miserable form will fare any better down the order....
 
Last edited:

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
Anil said:
is there any long-term purpose to this or no other reason than "it can't get any worse"?

1. dhoni and even ganguly are doing decently where they are right now, you'd be screwing with that....

2. there's absolutely no guarantee than sehwag in his current miserable form will fare any better down the order....
Just the way we might be screwing Dhon/Ganguly, we might be unscrewing Sehwag. That's my honest opinion.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Sending Sehwag down the order would send him the wrong message: you're doing fine mate, the ball's just doing too much early on for you.
Dropping him will send the right message: you're utter tripe mate, start putting a price on your wicket and learn how to score runs jiggle.
Are Ganguly or Dhoni any more likely to succeed against the new ball than Jaffer? Hell no. Jaffer looked good against the new ball at Durban apart from that **** shot.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Turbinator said:
Just the way we might be screwing Dhon/Ganguly, we might be unscrewing Sehwag. That's my honest opinion.
why would you want to screw two reasonable performers to "unscrew" a non-performer in what could be a very costly experiment for the team?
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
But apart from that inning Jaffer didn't do anything special. Also, his fielding doesn't help. And Sehwag is more than a handy offspinner and a pretty good fielder.
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
Anil said:
why would you want to screw two reasonable performers to "unscrew" a non-performer in what could be a very costly experiment for the team?
It'll only screw one, whichever one opens. That is IF it screws it up.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Turbinator said:
But apart from that inning Jaffer didn't do anything special. Also, his fielding doesn't help. And Sehwag is more than a handy offspinner.
LOL @ Sehwag making the team on his offspinning. Especially in tests.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Get rid of Sehwag. He can move down to the middle-order later in his career, but right now he looks as lost as Pathan. Jaffer and Gambhir to open.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Turbinator said:
But apart from that inning Jaffer didn't do anything special. Also, his fielding doesn't help. And Sehwag is more than a handy offspinner and a pretty good fielder.
So? Jaffer is hanging around, Sehwag is getting out first over. Why ruin two guys who are doing something, to help one guy who stinks at his job?
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
silentstriker said:
LOL @ Sehwag making the team on his offspinning. Especially in tests.
Offspinning, fielding, and who knows, this might just be the Test where he gets back into form.

I think they should pick him and Dravid and Chappell should have a long talk with him about this being his last chance.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Turbinator said:
Offspinning, fielding, and who knows, this might just be the Test where he gets back into form.
Or it could be the next test...or the one after that...or the one after that....

He's has enough chances.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Turbinator said:
Offspinning, fielding, and who knows, this might just be the Test where he gets back into form.
We need guys who are likely to hang around and score runs, not guys who might do this and that. The series is tied 1-1, FFS.
 

adharcric

International Coach
If you want any sort of accountability from the players, you have to be harsh like the Australians. Nobody should be undroppable, especially not Sehwag.
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
^ I 100 percent agree, however, changing the batting order slightly and the addition of one new player might just be what this Indian team needs. It's not like Jaffer has been a whole lot better than Sehwag.

We shouldn't take Sehwag out of the team just because he is overweight or just for the sake of teaching him a lesson.

However, yes Gambhir and Jaffer opening is what most likely is going to occur. However, I believe India should take this risk instead of opting for the obvious.
 

Top