• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

CricketFan90s

State Vice-Captain
You said he was an average bowler in the 1940's. More than half of that was taken up by war
He had a very bad 3 years - 1947, 1948 and 1949. Flat pitches and strong Australian team are the reasons. I see even South Africa hit him badly in these 3 years.
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
But how did Ray Lindwall had a decent record in those years ?
Not just Lindwall, bowling was dominated by Aussies in the 40’s.

Lindwall 70 @ 19.17 (19.93 vs Eng)
Johnston 54 @ 18.51 (23.33 vs Eng)
Miller 48 @ 21.41 (21.89 vs Eng)
Toshack 47 @ 21.04 (28.60 vs Eng)

Other sub 30 bowlers in the 40’s (min 20 wickets)
McCool (AUS) 30 @ 27.23
Cowie (NZ) 26 @ 22.03
Jones (WI) 21 @ 26.76
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
His strike rate was never exemplary and he played more years in his career in the 50's than the 40's
That’s not the discussion lol. You’re trying to excuse Bedser’s 40’s record by saying that all the 40’s pitches were horribly flat, yet Lindwall (and also guys like Miller and Johnston) have great records in the 40’s, which doesn’t match up.

You’re talking about the pitches of the 40’s, that has nothing to do with the later careers of the blokes.
 

CricketFan90s

State Vice-Captain
His strike rate was never exemplary and he played more years in his career in the 50's than the 40's
Top 2 Wicket Takers of 1940s
AV Bedser (ENG)1946-194923417548-2312959897/4933.242.3584.8082
RR Lindwall (AUS)1946-195017323688-1101342707/3819.172.1852.6825
Only 9 Innings he played less compared to Alec Bedser but however Bedser bowled an average of 31 Overs per innings and Lindwall bowled 19 Overs per Innings. So it shows How England was relying too much on Bedser.
 
Last edited:

CricketFan90s

State Vice-Captain
Top 5 Fast Bowlers of 1950s
JB Statham (ENG)1951-195947879995-37937371597/3923.502.2462.8675
RR Lindwall (AUS)1950-195942779470-28636871527/4324.252.3362.3067
AV Bedser (ENG)1950-195528518370-34329171477/4419.842.0956.93313
FS Trueman (ENG)1952-195931606200-23226851288/3120.972.5948.4395
Fazal Mahmood (PAK)1952-1959264378151302.345227651257/4222.122.1262.52612
This was the reason England had Hat-trick Ashes Series Victories in 1950s.

Bedser was a Work Horse that is the reason why Don Bradman took him in his All Time XI. Bedser bowled 29 Overs per Innings in his entire career (thats too much of workload on a single bowler) . So he is a good option in All Time England XI if they want to go with 4 bowlers and 7 batsmen in their team.
 
Last edited:

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Top 5 Fast Bowlers of 1950s
JB Statham (ENG)1951-195947879995-37937371597/3923.502.2462.8675
RR Lindwall (AUS)1950-195942779470-28636871527/4324.252.3362.3067
AV Bedser (ENG)1950-195528518370-34329171477/4419.842.0956.93313
FS Trueman (ENG)1952-195931606200-23226851288/3120.972.5948.4395
Fazal Mahmood (PAK)1952-1959264378151302.345227651257/4222.122.1262.52612
This was the reason England had Hat-trick Ashes Series Victories in 1950s. Bedser got more support in 1950s from Statham and Trueman, so may be that could have been one of the reason he played better in this decade.

Bedser was a Work Horse that is the reason why Don Bradman took him in his All Time XI. Bedser bowled 29 Overs per Innings in his entire career. So he is a good option in All Time England XI of they want to go with 4 bowlers and 7 batsmen in their team.
Bedser retired in 1955. He barely played with Statham or Trueman. The 3 of them played 0 tests together.
 

CricketFan90s

State Vice-Captain
Bedser retired in 1955. He barely played with Statham or Trueman.
have to agree with you. he did'nt get any support. So he was lone horse in english Team. 1953 Ashes he played hugh role in Englands victory. 1955 it was frank tyson.
It Looks like Lindwall had more support from other bowlers which alec Bedser was lacking through out his career.
 

peterhrt

U19 Cricketer
As deliberate policy, pitches in England and Australia started favouring bowlers from the 1950-51 Australian season. Bedser, aged 32, suddenly found regular purchase for his leg-cutter and his bowling was transformed, having previously been a steady inswing stock bowler. He remains the only bowler to take 30 wickets in Ashes series both home and away.

It would have been interesting to see him on the docile West Indian wickets of 1954, but England decided he needed a rest and left him at home.
 

CricketFan90s

State Vice-Captain
As deliberate policy, pitches in England and Australia started favouring bowlers from the 1950-51 Australian season. Bedser, aged 32, suddenly found regular purchase for his leg-cutter and his bowling was transformed, having previously been a steady inswing stock bowler. He remains the only bowler to take 30 wickets in Ashes series both home and away.

It would have been interesting to see him on the docile West Indian wickets of 1954, but England decided he needed a rest and left him at home.
looks like he is not good on flat pitches. As Lindwall maintained more consistent record.
 

peterhrt

U19 Cricketer
looks like he is not good on flat pitches. As Lindwall maintained more consistent record.
Lindwall was a lot faster with a nasty skidding bouncer and late outswing. After suffering from dropped slip catches, he developed an inswinger as well and was basically equipped for all surfaces. He didn't enjoy bowling long spells. Nor did Miller.

Bedser thrived on hard work and was very accurate. After his transformation in 1950-51, he produced several good performances on true pitches as well as on more helpful ones. As you say, over their entire careers Lindwall was more consistently successful.
 

kyear2

Cricketer Of The Year
That’s not the discussion lol. You’re trying to excuse Bedser’s 40’s record by saying that all the 40’s pitches were horribly flat, yet Lindwall (and also guys like Miller and Johnston) have great records in the 40’s, which doesn’t match up.

You’re talking about the pitches of the 40’s, that has nothing to do with the later careers of the blokes.
I wasn't trying to excuse Bedser's record, I was literally just saying that pitches in the 40's were flat, as they were pre war.

No agenda behind it.
 

Top