We'd have won if you set 250For those who watched how many could England have chased down last night? Would they have still won if we made 170?
Hell yeah. The Ashes really needed this. There's just never any rivalry between the two teams otherwise.Still the core is intact right? The guys will be carrying a bit of grudge which is so nice for such a rivalry. IIRC, in 2005, a similar English T20 win started off what culminated in the best Ashes I've ever watched.
Haha, good shout.I don't think there'll be a parade but I'm sure there'll be a crowd to greet them at the airport, why don't you go along and join them?
I just think having a commentator on (even he is negative on most things) is better than having to listen to the rest of the channel 9 cheerleaders... esp. when the team is not that all time great team they want us to think it is...I enjoy Chappell's commentary during 20/20 games, because he fulfils my overwhelming urge to complain constantly about everything that is happening in the game. Plus I just find his broken record whining about irrelevant issues like Mankad hilarious.
Anyway, England well on top here. Should really cruise this.
Agree with this massively.Haha, yeah. Can't say it isn't a welcome change. One of the more likeable teams around, and they've done more than enough to deserve this.
West Indies and Ireland beg to differ.The manner in which they steamrolled every opposition in the contest was impressive and professional
Yeah, to think that blunder almost cost his team the game there.Well done crims, you and your team of ring-ins did well!
Nah, looks like it was a very good performance from your guys on the day, which is what counts. Amazing catch from Collingwood to dismiss Clarke.
I'm glad we chose the right teams to hammer.West Indies and Ireland beg to differ.
Didn't we score the joint second highest innings score against the WI? Seems like quite a beating... oh and then we were robbed by rain which rules out everything that happened before it?West Indies and Ireland beg to differ.
WI were 2-60 after 6, kinda giving your bowlers a beating in the chase...never-mind the fairness of the actual result, you didn't steamroll the West Indies (which I think you'll find is Nath's point...)Didn't we score the joint second highest innings score against the WI? Seems like quite a beating... oh and then we were robbed by rain which rules out everything that happened before it?
The WI game is irrelevant because we never got to see the entire game. As far as Im concerned, the only reason that game had a result was because of the rather ridiculous rules surrounding rain and the t20 format.WI were 2-60 after 6, kinda giving your bowlers a beating in the chase...never-mind the fairness of the actual result, you didn't steamroll the West Indies (which I think you'll find is Nath's point...)
The rain came down after 2 overs did it not? And from the get go they always knew they would be chasing a reducted target...hardly gave our bowlers a 'beating in the chase'WI were 2-60 after 6, kinda giving your bowlers a beating in the chase...never-mind the fairness of the actual result, you didn't steamroll the West Indies (which I think you'll find is Nath's point...)