Line and Length
Cricketer Of The Year
Yorkshire tried him at 3 some seasons back then realised he was more suited to 5 or 6.
The England selectors, once again, have erred.
The England selectors, once again, have erred.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Harry Brook
- Thread starter halba
- Start date
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
He actually opened a few times a well.
Just moving everyone up one would have made much more sense, but apparently Root and Stokes have inflexible batting positions so they've got what they've got.
GoodAreasShane
Cricketer Of The Year
Brook was genuinely pretty crap in his early Yorkshire career in general iirc
Red_Ink_Squid
Cricketer Of The Year
Another thing those two have in common is that Ballance was never a #3 either but got crowbarred into the spot for England because nobody else wanted it. Both better coming in later in the order.
Brook obviously seems to have a much higher ceiling than Ballance, so hopefully they figure things out for him.
loterry1994
International Debutant
Number 5 just might be his spot.
Red_Ink_Squid
Cricketer Of The Year
Please continue to make threads like this for each England player. Does the trick every time!
Adorable Asshole
International Regular
What? He didn't destroyed Johnson.
Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
Wagner > Johnson
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Who ****in doesn’t
loterry1994
International Debutant
I don’t know bout his technique but his got that sort of toughness I like in a player.
I think this series will have done him the world of good.
As the series has gone on, he's general played in a more orthodox style - the baseball shots and wild slogging have largely disappeared.
He's a seriously talented player who will be the backbone of our batting for the next decade or so.
Niall
International Coach
Memory is gone atm!
I think it was just the 2nd test where he was awful?
A few cheapish dismissals elsewhere but played to the situation more often than not, as others have said a solid first Ashes series.
Can't wait to see him in India, obviously Ashwin could destroy him but also could be the difference maker if we get some low scoring shoot outs. Box office cricketer IMO.