In 1999 the Windies still had a big reputation. Day 1, 1st test they got to 270/0. On day 2 Cairns took a 3-fer as they were restricted to 365. He then top-scored with 72 off 82 as NZ replied with 393, and took 7-27 in the 2nd innings (10 for the match) as NZ rolled them.I will say that I generally agree with Steve in that Cairns never had as many games where he bossed high profile opposition with bat and ball like Flintoff did in that 05 test series. The only case that really comes to mind was the 4th test in the 99 England v NZ series were Cairns flattened England’s top-order...
This exactlyCairns, though Flintoff did have a very mini Botham phase where he was absolutely playing at ATG standards for a season or 2
Also a good point. The performance Flintoff is most known for is built on a foundation of systematic cheating unlike any seen in the game before or sinceFlintoff used Murray mints
Did they though? They'd been pummelled 4-zip by SA, got bundled out in the group phase of the '99 World Cup and Curtly wasn't touring. I'll grant you they were still a damn sight better than every WI side that's toured since but I think everyone had cottoned on to the fact that WI cricket was starting to rot by that point, especially when they were on tour.In 1999 the Windies still had a big reputation. Day 1, 1st test they got to 270/0. On day 2 Cairns took a 3-fer as they were restricted to 365. He then top-scored with 72 off 82 as NZ replied with 393, and took 7-27 in the 2nd innings (10 for the match) as NZ rolled them.
They drew with an ATG Australia-side in 99, albeit without a proper WarneDid they though? They'd been pummelled 4-zip by SA the year prior and Curtly wasn't touring. I'll grant you they were still a damn sight better than every WI side that's toured since but I think everyone had cottoned on to the fact that WI cricket was starting to rot by that point
I will always maintain WI were still gun in 99 so I can argue for Sinclair's debut double being one of the greatest innings of all time.Did they though? They'd been pummelled 4-zip by SA, got bundled out in the group phase of the '99 World Cup and Curtly wasn't touring. I'll grant you they were still a damn sight better than every WI side that's toured since but I think everyone had cottoned on to the fact that WI cricket was starting to rot by that point, especially when they were on tour.
I wonder if this is the only example of a 1st innings batting side having a 250+ run opening stand and managing to lose from that point in testsIn 1999 the Windies still had a big reputation. Day 1, 1st test they got to 270/0. On day 2 Cairns took a 3-fer as they were restricted to 365. He then top-scored with 72 off 82 as NZ replied with 393, and took 7-27 in the 2nd innings (10 for the match) as NZ rolled them.
Yeah 2-2. Lara was immense.They drew with an ATG Australia-side in 99, albeit without a proper Warne
I wonder if this is the only example of a 1st innings batting side having a 250+ run opening stand and managing to lose from that point in tests
Talk about throwing away a good start
I remember the Carlisle/Gripper one - Zimbabwe somehow managed to end up losing that by about 300 runs.Partnership records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
Yeah, it's a weird one, because Curtly, Courtney and Lara still had enough residual magic left to make them a sporadically monstrous opponent, but it was becoming rarer and rarer, especially - as said - when they were on tour.I feel like that '99 series was a dead cat bounce in their terminal decline. And tbh it was nearly 100% down to Lara. They had been obliterated in SA just prior as stated
Neither do I, although I guess it has to be acknowledged that Cairns has been convicted/penalised/found guilty of nothing, so he's as in the conversation as any other person (not in my view, but from a 'legal' standpoint)Don't really think the Cairns/Amir/Hansies of the world should be in these sorts of talks.
Also. A better attack than some of what NZ sent to sub-continent in that 1996ish era. In particular to Pak in 1996.Better attacks than India in that era.
We had Cairns and Doull in Pakistan (and Doull won us a test there in a 1-1 draw).Also. A better attack than some of what NZ sent to sub-continent in that 1996ish era. In particular to Pak in 1996.
?Better attacks than India in that era.
lol how?Cairns boring
lol, thats how.lol how?