capt_Luffy
International Captain
I feel Graeme Smith got a little overrated; also have Sehwag below Hayden.Hayden has been screwed a bit. Not much between him and G Smith or Sehwag and he's arguably better than both.
I feel Graeme Smith got a little overrated; also have Sehwag below Hayden.Hayden has been screwed a bit. Not much between him and G Smith or Sehwag and he's arguably better than both.
Yeah… seeing 5 batsmen between him and Sehwag just looks completely off to me, I always have had them right next to each other.Hayden has been screwed a bit. Not much between him and G Smith or Sehwag and he's arguably better than both.
McCabe haven't received a single vote till now, and imo; is not making the cut. The other one is trickier, though my choice would had been Clarke; who is below Pietersen and Laxman for me. Simpson should had gotten a rank above Hayden and Sehwag.Another thing to watch - Amla is a fresh entry on the list - which of the remaining batsman from the 2022 list will miss out?
Simpson?
Chanderpaul?
Inzamam?
McCabe?
Hill?
Clarke?
that wasn’treally cricketBest Test batsman pre Hobbs, is worse than 2000s.... Like what?? 10th best batsman....
Yeah, we all know cricket began when you were born.....that wasn’treally cricket
Should be McCabe. He's KP from the 30s.Another thing to watch - Amla is a fresh entry on the list - which of the remaining batsman from the 2022 list will miss out?
Simpson?
Chanderpaul?
Inzamam?
McCabe?
Hill?
Clarke?
He was similarly aggressive (SR 61.5 vs KP’s 61.7) and capable of playing outstanding innings.Should be McCabe. He's KP from the 30s.
Yes, my comparison was very well thought out. Also played for roughly as long.He was similarly aggressive (SR 61.5 vs KP’s 61.7) and capable of playing outstanding innings.
Hutton actually rose significantly in this poll, over the likes of Viv, Lara and Smith. I think Simpson was a little overrated there, but no ways there are 18 batsmen between him and Smith. What I understood is that CW as a collective is quite fickle minded regarding the 2nd tier of Test openers.Comparing the 2022 poll with this one, the most alarming changes have been among the openers. In the Top 10, Hobbs and Hutton both slipped back a bit but it's after Gavaskar and Sutcliffe that things get interesting. Graeme Smith climbs 7 spots, jumping ahead of Boycott, Trumper and Simpson. This trio dropped a combined 25 places. Greenidge also climbed 7 spots to pass Trumper, Sehwag and Hayden in the process. Previously Sehwag and Haydn were ranked one after the other, but now there is a significant gap between them. Simpson had the biggest fall from grace with Smith, Greenidge, Sehwag and Hayden all previously ranked below him but now above him. Did the 2022 poll get it very wrong, or has this poll over-compensated?
Yeah think Smith at 30 and Sehwag at 37 are both a bit high.Hayden has been screwed a bit. Not much between him and G Smith or Sehwag and he's arguably better than both.
Agreed. There doesn’t seem to be a general consensus on openers after Gavaskar, with multiple names often thrown around; Trumper, Simpson, Boycott, Greenidge, Hayden, Sehwag, Smith.Hutton actually rose significantly in this poll, over the likes of Viv, Lara and Smith. I think Simpson was a little overrated there, but no ways there are 18 batsmen between him and Smith. What I understood is that CW as a collective is quite fickle minded regarding the 2nd tier of Test openers.
I've been particularly surprised by the votes for Bruce Mitchell. He seems to be highly rated in this poll. I thought he'd be behind the likes of Morris and Lawry, and on about the Cook/Gooch/Hanif level.Agreed. There doesn’t seem to be a general consensus on openers after Gavaskar, with multiple names often thrown around; Trumper, Simpson, Boycott, Greenidge, Hayden, Sehwag, Smith.
He is a bit similar to Simpson re: having a much better record as an opener. He struggled against Australia (even though he did not play in Grimmett’s 36/37 series - in fact, his last 15 tests were all against England) but was very strong against England (and New Zealand). He’s the only one amongst the next group of openers who averages 45+ home and away (48 and 49).I've been particularly surprised by the votes for Bruce Mitchell. He seems to be highly rated in this poll. I thought he'd be behind the likes of Morris and Lawry, and on about the Cook/Gooch level.
He played in that series; in fact all 5 matches and scored 251 @31; and that was the only time he played Aussies at home. He, according to Cricinfo, never missed a Test between his debut in 1929 and retirement in 1949.He is a bit similar to Simpson re: having a much better record as an opener. He struggled against Australia (even though he did not play in Grimmett’s 36/37 series - in fact, his last 15 tests were all against England) but was very strong against England (and New Zealand). He’s the only one amongst the next group of openers who averages 45+ home and away (48 and 49).
Wouldn't say fickle, but it is quite middled.Hutton actually rose significantly in this poll, over the likes of Viv, Lara and Smith. I think Simpson was a little overrated there, but no ways there are 18 batsmen between him and Smith. What I understood is that CW as a collective is quite fickle minded regarding the 2nd tier of Test openers.
If you know this, why create such a fuss each and every time.Agreed. There doesn’t seem to be a general consensus on openers after Gavaskar, with multiple names often thrown around; Trumper, Simpson, Boycott, Greenidge, Hayden, Sehwag, Smith.
One reason Barry Richards’ name is brought up far too much is likely as a result of this lack of consensus, and there being such a clear gap for most people between the top 4 and the rest.
Well, to be fair, bringing in Barry doesn't solved the problem. I do have Barry in my 3rd World XI; but he really can't be called a Test great.If you know this, why create such a fuss each and every time.