Nah, not in this case.This fifth/sixth bowler problem and our openers are our glaring weaknesses. PEWS's side is what I'd like to pick though Anderson having to bowl 10 every match is disaster-city, let alone that there's no leeway if a front line bowler has a bad day. Perhaps McCullum rolling his arm over in the UAE a sign that he thinks he'll need to in the World Cup too. Guptill to chip in with a couple of overs and Taylor to add to his seven career ODI overs too, so as to confuse the opposition with the number of bits and pieces we direct at them.
There's no obvious good solution though. Dan to champion Neesham as opener under the 'solve both problems badly' principle.
It's a weakness every team in the World Cup is going to have -- I mean, look at the options for fifth and sixth bowlers for each Top 8 side:
- AUS: Marsh/Maxwell + Watson
- ENG: Bopara + Moeen
- IND: Jadeja + Rohit/Kohli
- NZ: Anderson + Williamson
- PAK: Hafeez + Alam
- SL: Mathews + Dilshan
- RSA: Duminy + de Villiers/du Plessis
- WI: Bravo + Samuels
None of those 5th/6th combinations exactly inspire confidence; only Australia and arguably SL have 6th bowlers of any note whatsoever, and Watson's ODI bowling has regressed dramatically anyway. Basically, if a bowler from any team has an especially bad day, they're ****ed. It isn't endemic to NZ at all. Which is why ensuring your bowlers don't have a bad day is crucial to this tournament IMO.
Incidentally, that's why I would consider dropping half of the Australian bowlers on offer or Mitch M, in particular. Both go missing way too often, even if they are deadly on their day.