No it did not. He may have missed it though. I left out Tendulkar in my India test teamUmmm... is it just me or does Beleg's ODI team NOT include Imran?
Yeah was just thinking that and went back looking for anyone else commenting on it.Ummm... is it just me or does Beleg's ODI team NOT include Imran?
Jeez he has a couple of lesser seasons and people just jump off the bandwagon so quickly!No it did not. He may have missed it though. I left out Tendulkar in my India test team
Nah, Yousuf averages 1 with the ball, best ODI bowler ever.Well putting in Imran for Youssuf would definitely improve the bowling stocks...
i heared hanif mohmmad was a good opener at least in test matches. i am supprised that people complatly miss that.The bowling is thin with just four regular bowlers PLUS Aamir Sohail. I would bring Imran and reduce one batsman probably Yousuf. If I had to strengthen batting further I would get another allrounder like Intikhab at the cost of Shoaib. Imran, Wasim and Waqar is a good enough pace attack with Saqlain, Intikhab and Sohail providing three different types of spin.
I am not too happy to see a batsman of limited abilities like Sohail as an opener in an all time side that too for a gifted team like Pakistan. But they have always had a problem there havent they.
I left out Imran deliberately. While I have no doubt that he was a fine ODI cricketer and probably deserves to be in the all-time Pakistani ODI team, I wanted an extra batsman. I think in Wasim-Waqar-Shoaib-Saqlain we have arguably four of the best ODI bowlers ever and the likes of Aamir Shoail and even Miandad and Inzamam [Inzamam played first class cricket primarily as a bowler in the beginning, his scalps included some of the most prominent pakistani batsmen at that time] would be able to contribute ten overs and Yousuf is just such a verstille ODI batsmen that it seems like a crime to leave him out of the team.Ummm... is it just me or does Beleg's ODI team NOT include Imran?
Haha wtfBeleg said:Inzamam played first class cricket primarily as a bowler in the beginning, his scalps included some of the most prominent pakistani batsmen at that time
No they dont but people do miss the context in the midst of an argument.i heared hanif mohmmad was a good opener at least in test matches. i am supprised that people complatly miss that.
Oh yes, he once took 28 wickets (out of his career total of 39) in a season @ 33.03.
In the same season he got 1645 runs (far and away his highest tally in any season) @ 60.92.
Obviously he was playing as a bowler then...
The inclusion of Aamer Sohail in alltime ODI XIs of many Pakistanis is based on the fact that Saeed Anwar-Aamer Sohail is the best opening pair Pakistan has ever got.The bowling is thin with just four regular bowlers PLUS Aamir Sohail. I would bring Imran and reduce one batsman probably Yousuf. If I had to strengthen batting further I would get another allrounder like Intikhab at the cost of Shoaib. Imran, Wasim and Waqar is a good enough pace attack with Saqlain, Intikhab and Sohail providing three different types of spin.
I am not too happy to see a batsman of limited abilities like Sohail as an opener in an all time side that too for a gifted team like Pakistan. But they have always had a problem there havent they.
I heard a similar argument in the opening batsmen for 1877-1914 era debate. Hobbs and Sutcliffe being the most successful opening pair.The inclusion of Aamer Sohail in alltime ODI XIs of many Pakistanis is based on the fact that Saeed Anwar-Aamer Sohail is the best opening pair Pakistan has ever got.
And yes Hanif was a tremendous opener. I had the great fortune to watch him open in a test match. I was too young to appreciate his greatness as I would have done even five years later but he was still a REAL superstar. It was a privilege.i heared hanif mohmmad was a good opener at least in test matches. i am supprised that people complatly miss that.
http://forum.cricketweb.net/showpost.php?p=990535&postcount=20Ummm... is it just me or does Beleg's ODI team NOT include Imran?