There is a huge difference between being a big hitter and a great batsman. All of the above could hit any bowler in the world with gay abandon on their day, but none could be relied upon to win you a match. I would take Bevan or Tendulkar over all of these any day.zinzan12 said:Mine .....
Cairns
Afridi
Razzak
Flintoff
I didn't start this tread intending to simply name great batsmen...The thread was.....5 top batsmen you'd like at the crease for the slog overs(last 10).a massive zebra said:There is a huge difference between being a big hitter and a great batsman. All of the above could hit any bowler in the world with gay abandon on their day, but none could be relied upon to win you a match. I would take Bevan or Tendulkar over all of these any day.
Yes McCullum is very promising, not quite in the Cairns, Afridi category yet. But in a slightly different and often clever way he can do heaps of damage in the last 10.bryce said:brendon mccullum is the perfect sort of player for the last 10 overs IMO, he can play big shots, is as fast as anyone between wickets, rotates the strike almost at will and above all is great at improvising when required - although he hasn't fully proven himself yet he will do in time
Good point. Can't deny that Afridi is incredible unrealiable. However I select Afridi along with my other choices on the assumption that they would be firing and on top of their form. Even if that is 1 out of 20 innings for Afridi.Beleg said:I can't quite see this favour of Afridi. I wonder how many people would have put him in their top five if it weren't for his exaggerated style and the recent trashing.
He averages 15 at No 6, 25 at No 5, 14 at No 7 and 20 at no 8. [20 mainly due to his recent inning] with only two fifties in over 40 matches.
Compare this to Razzaq, who averages 30 of 44 matches with 1 hundred and 3 fifties at No 6, 33 at number seven from fifty-nine matches [many fifties], and 45 from 19 matches at number 8.
And the rest!!!!zinzan12 said:Now it that all clicked together....You could have a 400 score...
Yes.Pratyush said:The only reason people would tend towards Afridi is because of his strike rate. But Razzaq has a good strike rate and is far more consistent. Much better in the lower order.
To make the point again. I wasn't referring to how consistent or inconsistent Afridi is. I merely raised a hypothetical situation where if I had the choice to see any world batsmen at their absolute best(no matter how rear it may be for afridi) batting out the slog overs of a onedayer, then Afridi one of my top 5.Pratyush said:The only reason people would tend towards Afridi is because of his strike rate. But Razzaq has a good strike rate and is far more consistent. Much better in the lower order.