100% positive. NRR is the total number of runs scored, divided by your total overs faced, minues the total number of runs conceded, divided by overs bowled.Are you sure about that?
Need some links in here. My brain's getting confused. I thought the NRR in your scenario would become 3.
It's not, but there's always been a (pretty strong IMO) argument to suggest it should be, so all games are counted equally. If you smash a team by a big margin, it's always a lot more beneficial to have batted first because 50 overs counts for a greater percentage of your NRR than 25 overs or whatever you need to chase a small target. Using a sum of net run rates rather than an overall net run rate would remove that problem.Ah, I see. I thought NRR was added up from game to game rather than averaged out.
Bonus point system?no one really can be bothered thinking of a better way of distinguishing between two teams on the same number of points.
A bonus point system doesn't distinguish between two teams on the same number of points; it just makes it a slightly less likely occurrence.Bonus point system?
Is that a suggestion for the NRR issue or an apropos-of-nothing gear grind?Duckworth/Lewis.
The rise of pay tv, IMHO.Cheerleading commentators. Most of them seem to think their job is to pump up the tyres of whoever appears on screen at any moment during a game.
When did commentating become about PR? There must have been a moment in time when the change happened.
I get the impression Bumble really is that enthusiastic. Good for him, I guess.
Nick Knight is their cheerleader. Then there's Bob Willis, who is the opposite, but somehow worse.
Also that he never made a bad decision in his life on the field. He doesn't sound world-weary so much as bitter.Well if he's your cup of tea then fine, but to me the way he comes over most of the time is that he doesn't actually like cricket.
I'll see you a Botham and raise you a Healy. Dear God, the pair of them should be banned.Ian Botham is a ****ing idiot, basically.