Sorry, I didn't realise that you have to reply to every post you read.Don't know how else to put my displeasure on an obvious attempt to troll.
Occasionally, very occasionally I leave a topic without posting in it. Try it some time!
Sorry, I didn't realise that you have to reply to every post you read.Don't know how else to put my displeasure on an obvious attempt to troll.
You don't own me.Sorry, I didn't realise that you have to reply to every post you read.
Occasionally, very occasionally I leave a topic without posting in it. Try it some time!
Haha, I usually merge those two texts into one, covers all my needsJeez, does your mate have nothing better to do? Seems a strange and pointless text?
I only have 2 texts that I send. "You fancy a pint?" and "Im sorry. Love you". Covers 90% of all needs
BTW what was your answer to the question from your mate?
I only have 2 texts that I send. "You fancy a pint?" and "Im sorry. Love you". Covers 90% of all needs
And I thought you meant it.Haha, I usually merge those two texts into one, covers all my needs
Aware this is old news however:Don't agree with the general sentiment of Rich's post there, but the bit about having kids around at presentation ceremonies, celebrations etc really annoys me. What has the child done to warrant being on centre-stage? The moment should be all about the players themselves and no-one else.
Tbh the kid was cute.Aware this is old news however:
Haydos kid was off stage at the commencment of the press conference, it was meant to be haydos only...the kid came running to his dad, pulling on his shirt and saying "dad,dad,dad," over and over...what would any father do? of course he's gonna pick his kid up, did you want him to call his wife on to remove the child?
Get Richard.Lack of Cricket related battles recently on CW.
Any ideas in the pipeline?
**** no.Get Richard.
Kenya innings (target: 286 runs from 50 overs) R B 4s 6s SR
KO Otieno b Chigumbura 20 38 1 1 52.63
S Waters b Chigumbura 29 60 5 0 48.33
A Obanda not out 96 93 7 5 103.22
SO Tikolo b Chigumbura 3 5 0 0 60.00
MA Ouma c wicketkeeperMutizwa b Cremer 11 30 0 0 36.66
CO Obuya b Cremer 14 14 2 0 100.00
[B]RR Patel b Utseya 10 26 1 0 38.46 [/B]
RL Bhudia b Cremer 8 8 1 0 100.00
N Odhiambo c Chigumbura b Price 8 10 0 1 80.00
HA Varaiya run out (Price) 9 6 0 0 150.00
PJ Ongondo c Matsikenyeri b Chigumbura 1 4 0 0 25.00
Extras (b 4, lb 1, w 5) 10
Total (all out; 49 overs) 219
yes. thankyou for contributing nothing to the conversation yet again.Tbh the kid was cute.
The irony of it!yes. thankyou for contributing nothing to the conversation yet again.
It's not a case of getting over anything, I will simply question something that seems odd to me if it seems odd. You don't have to answer, obviously, but it seemed and remains seeming odd to me. Obviously, though, there's no forum rule against putting posting-IDs in -s- after every post, so if you wish to waste effort doing it, that's your choice. Each to his own.I like doing it, because I like doing it. Honestly, all the attention over such a minor thing is ridiculous. I don't feel I need to justify myself about this, so you will just have to get over it.
No-one's said Hayden hasn't played a key part in Australia's successes between 2001/02 and 2004 and 2005/06 and 2007/08. That doesn't amount to 100 Tests, or close to, but he did do it. He's far inferior to Stephen Waugh, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath and others, but he did indeed "fill a niche role".As if. He's filled a niche role in the Australian team for 100-plus Tests, same as Waugh, McGrath and Warne. Speaks for itself. Sophistry on an internet forum over whether he could play a mint-slathered ball on a green deck against Ambrose, Wasim, Donald and Walsh on debut during a pivotal Test without offering a chance - because Jack ****ing Hobbs could, right? - doesn't matter when viewing a player's achievements and contribution with rose-coloured glasses. Doesn't demean any of the scores of times he's gotten Australia off to a flyer or been the pillar of the order. Just because there was depth in the domestic system that offered comparable alternatives to Hayden when it didn't with Warne and McGrath doesn't mitigate anything that Hayden did in Tests, which was an awful lot.
On that note, I do think on this forum there's been an awful lot of mouth-running over what Hayden hasn't done, as opposed to what he has. For once, I'm kinda relieved Channel Nine don't feel the same way.