• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

You know what really grinds my cricketing gears?

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
It's an inevitable side-effect of the high calibre of cricket discussion around these parts IMO.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
High calibre.

:laugh:

Hayden!
Hussain!
Hayden!
Hussain!

Sobers!
Khan!
Botham!
Sobers!
Khan!
Botham!

1/2 the threads TBH.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
As I say - inevitable side-effect.

On other matters - (have you) ever considered heightening the calibre of the writing on the front page by offering your services? We've traditionally been strong on the Kiwi contingent but currently have a sum reprisentative of 2.

Always on the lookout for quality forum posters who'd be willing to offer small amounts of their time.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
People posting in rant threads when they're not ranting.

Should go start their own thread. Some threads are ok to drag into the same off-topic mess that 80% of the threads end up as, but the rant thread should maintain its purity. Really annoys me!
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
That'd eliminate about 80% of the posts in this thread TBH.

Discussion strays, but in a thread like this the topic shall not die.

In fact, it grinds my gears when people expect every post in a thread to stay exactly on the topic of the title, TBH. FFS, evolution of conversation is one of the joys of life.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Golf

I love it, but **** it's frustrating when you don't play well. I'd been hitting them well during PE so thought I'd get a few mates around for a game on the local course. ****en disaster.
 

nightprowler10

Global Moderator
Golf

I love it, but **** it's frustrating when you don't play well. I'd been hitting them well during PE so thought I'd get a few mates around for a game on the local course. ****en disaster.
Keep at it. You'll get better soon enough and have a game that'll flash in front of your eyes before you die. Makes all the hard work to get there really worth it IMO.

Wrong grinding thread btw.
 
Last edited:

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Michael Slater's Commentary

The commentary box is no place for someone with Bi-Polar disorder. I mean who says 'tootsies' when commentating on a cricket match. Dire.
 

andruid

Cricketer Of The Year
Mike Atherton commenting on Associate cricket-in fact any Sky presenter discussing Associate cricket they don't know jack all:@
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mike Atherton commenting on Associate cricket-in fact any Sky presenter discussing Associate cricket they don't know jack all:@
Fair enough, they shouldn't spend their time researching a whole heap of stuff about nations we'll see once every four years.
 

jammay123

State 12th Man
Backing up really annoys me. if the person backs up and the bowler dislodges his bails he should be out. because they are bascially stealing a single when they walk halfway down the pitch and the bowler is powerless to stop it.it should be like in baseball when you try to steal a base you can get out.

also runners annoy me. if the person is not fit enough to complete a run he shouldnt get a run. simple as.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Yeah, have often thought both those (to an extent) TBH. I think most people agree that the current running rules are ludicrous, in that the batsman can in essence back-up before the bowler even releases the ball. I'm happy enough with the traditional one-warning thing, but I could see why people wouldn't be.

And I've more than once wondered why someone should be forced to retire hurt if unable to complete runs. Only rarely does anyone get that far with a runner anyway, so I actually think "run or retire hurt" would benefit most batsmen ITE.
 

Flem274*

123/5
NZC, The NZ media, Life in general

NZC as stated in my signiture, are the biggest traitors that the history of cricket and the world has ever known. They dump the greatest leader we've ever had and make him look like a traitor with all this talk of the ICL. The NZ media give Fleming a send off with a replay of a mi**** that was caught behind. Never mind he's one of the few NZ skippers to have success in Australia, never mind he made Murali look stupid in Colombo with his highest test score. Nope, he doesn't matter one bit to this country which is too busy watching meatheads smash portugal instead of backing their team. I havent turned the radio on yet but I bet anyone who calls about the cricket will play the blame game and scream for half the nation to be dropped, or the return of Tama Canning. Fleming would be an awesome leader in SA at the moment, Vettori looked absolutley clueless out there, and while I back our new skipper all the way I don't beleive he's the right man for the job. The top order, predictably, is looking fragile. can't have anything to do with Flemings absence of course, no no certainly not. I now call for Holy War against NZC!!!

:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Minnows
No good. Probably will never be any good. Dire up cricket IMO. The game has got by just fine for over a century as an international sport with as few as two teams playing it. The nations where it has an organic following and generates some enthusiasm amongst the public have already gained test status. Zimbabwe and Bangers are embarrassments as test nations (although Zimbabwe have shown they can do alright at Twenty20, I also suspect they'd hold their own against Australia in paper-rocks-scissors which would be almost as relevant to their status as a test nation), and the gap between those two and the next rung is bigger than the gap between them and the other 8 test nations.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Minnows
No good. Probably will never be any good. Dire up cricket IMO. The game has got by just fine for over a century as an international sport with as few as two teams playing it. The nations where it has an organic following and generates some enthusiasm amongst the public have already gained test status. Zimbabwe and Bangers are embarrassments as test nations (although Zimbabwe have shown they can do alright at Twenty20, I also suspect they'd hold their own against Australia in paper-rocks-scissors which would be almost as relevant to their status as a test nation), and the gap between those two and the next rung is bigger than the gap between them and the other 8 test nations.
Aren't they no longer a test nation?
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
The fact I'm not sure means that either way they're rather too close to being a test nation.
 

Top