• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Yashasvi Jaiswal vs Kamindu Mendis vs Rachin Ravindra vs Harry Brook

Who do you predict will end as the greatest test batsman?


  • Total voters
    22

Coronis

International Coach
Actually tho Jaiswal and Brook will likely get big longevity points on Mendis. He’s getting started pretty late and SL doesn’t play as many tests.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
My gut feeling is Mendis will be more Chanderpaul than Lara.

Nothing wrong with that as it will still be a great test career and SL needs a solid batsman. The test will be to see when Angelo pulls the plug and see if Kamindu can bat 4 and be the fulcrum of the line-up. If he shows Chanders' level batting ability and output but not his thought process, it should be fine and SL will be well served for the next 10 years at least.
 

Migara

International Coach
My gut feeling is Mendis will be more Chanderpaul than Lara.

Nothing wrong with that as it will still be a great test career and SL needs a solid batsman. The test will be to see when Angelo pulls the plug and see if Kamindu can bat 4 and be the fulcrum of the line-up. If he shows Chanders' level batting ability and output but not his thought process, it should be fine and SL will be well served for the next 10 years at least.
He is Chanderpaul than Lara anyway. He is a very sedate batsman. He has worked him self at batting in limited overs, and that is the reason to see him score quickly. But at core, he is a sedate, boring, plonker, who can occupy the crease for ages.
 

Coronis

International Coach
He is Chanderpaul than Lara anyway. He is a very sedate batsman. He has worked him self at batting in limited overs, and that is the reason to see him score quickly. But at core, he is a sedate, boring, plonker, who can occupy the crease for ages.
Career SR of 60 in FC over 50 matches, but more Chanders than Lara? I don’t buy that.
 

Migara

International Coach
Career SR of 60 in FC over 50 matches, but more Chanders than Lara? I don’t buy that.
That is a very recent advancement. Believe me, we know the players from their school days. This guy could bat for your life. So is Pathum Nissanka. Both had to develop them selves in to white ball cricketers to survive and to be selected in T20 franchises.
 

Top