• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

WTC v The Ashes

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
I would keep the regular schedule and just take the Top 4 Test Nations over 4 years and have a winners/losers bracket tournament played in England over 2 months:

Round #1
1 vs. 4
2 vs. 3

Round #2
Winner of 1v4 vs. Winner of 2v3 (Winner goes onto final)
Loser of 1v4 vs. Loser of 2v3

Round #3 - Preliminary Final
Loser of winners bracket vs. Winner of losers bracket (Winner goes onto final)

Round #4 - Grand Final (Best of 3 Test Series)
Round 2 Winner vs. Round 3 Winner

8 Tests across 2 months. Both finalists will play around 5 Tests.

Drawn Test matches = higher seed advances/wins.
Important to move it around rather than always holding it in England though.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
They lost the first test on literally the last ball on day 5 you utter buffoon.
Against the worst kiwi team in years who were handicapped by injuries during the game

Then they won the toss in the next game and sent them in & are being slaughtered

For a buffoon, I sure am right a lot :laugh:
 

Sunil1z

International Regular
No. Of Test series won in England this century
SL=1
IND=1
AUS =1

No.of Test series drawn in England this century

SL=1
IND=1
AUS=1
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lmao SL is always teetering on the precipice of minnowhood until they rock up to a series England or NZ with no name fast bowlers and hold their own or win the Asia Cup for the millionth time. Can't wait until they knock out one of the big dogs in the World Cup this year.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lmao NZ is always teetering on the precipice of minnowhood until they rock up to a series England or NZ with no name fast bowlers and hold their own or win the Asia Cup for the millionth time. Can't wait until they knock out one of the big dogs in the World Cup this year.
I presume you’re talking about SL not NZ?
 

Flem274*

123/5
Lmao NZ is always teetering on the precipice of minnowhood until they rock up to a series England or NZ with no name fast bowlers and hold their own or win the Asia Cup for the millionth time. Can't wait until they knock out one of the big dogs in the World Cup this year.
NZ won a million Asia Cups? ****in Aramex lost our parcels clearly.
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
I reckon WTC should be every 3 years. 4 years is too long as teams may change dramatically and results aren't fresh. All of the 9 teams play each other (India v Pakistan somewhere neutral) in 3+ match series (4 home/away). Extra tests can be arranged including ones with Zim, Afg, and Ire.
Top qualifier goes straight to final. 2 plays 3. If it is a draw 2 goes to final.

3 match final series, and 3 match promotion- relegation between 9th team and winner of Zim, Afg, Ire before next cycle.
I would keep the regular schedule and just take the Top 4 Test Nations over 4 years and have a winners/losers bracket tournament played in England over 2 months:

Round #1
1 vs. 4
2 vs. 3

Round #2
Winner of 1v4 vs. Winner of 2v3 (Winner goes onto final)
Loser of 1v4 vs. Loser of 2v3

Round #3 - Preliminary Final
Loser of winners bracket vs. Winner of losers bracket (Winner goes onto final)

Round #4 - Grand Final (Best of 3 Test Series)
Round 2 Winner vs. Round 3 Winner

8 Tests across 2 months. Both finalists will play around 5 Tests.

Drawn Test matches = higher seed advances/wins.
This would all be fantastic but the real problem is squeezing it all in on the calendar.
It's better we got something than nothing, but clearly improvements need to be made to the WTC, because reality is that it's Walt Disney at it's best.
 

Top