marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Yes IMO he would.dro87 said:What he make it S.A. or in Sri Lanka???
An average of just under 30 in Zimbabwe's line up.
Also it would over one of the quota.
Yes IMO he would.dro87 said:What he make it S.A. or in Sri Lanka???
What are your criteria for best keeper?JC_088 said:I don't think he'd make the New Zea;and side, Brendon McCullum is the third best keeper in the world after Gilchrist and Sangakara.
Gilchrist is a better keeper then him, he still makes the odd mistake, whereas Gilchirst hardly makes any. I also remember when he kept to Ray Price in Australia two seasons ago he made a few noticable mistakes, but that was kind of over shadowed by how bad Dravid and Patel kept that series. If he makes mistakes aganist Price then u have to wonder how well he would keep to Harbajan and Kumble.Dasa said:Taibu is better with the gloves than those 3. I think Taibu probably would make the Indian side - I haven't seen him 'keep to quality spin though.
I don't know about making the SA side, Boucher is a better keeper and better batsmen, but i guess if the quota debate came into it he might get infront of him.marc71178 said:Yes IMO he would.
An average of just under 30 in Zimbabwe's line up.
Also it would over one of the quota.
So what he is carry this Zimbabwe team, Chris Read would carry this Zimbabwe team as well, does that mean he would make every other Test Side in the world apart from Australia.marc71178 said:He's playing in a vastly struggling side, and basically carrying the batting (as well as captaining)
He's what, 21?
He's already the best glovesman around.
The only side I wouldn't put him in is Australia, but that's because of Gilchrist's batting, nothing else.
I haven't seen much of Read so I can't comment, but Taibu is a better pure 'keeper than the other 2. Boucher is steady without being brilliant, and Gilchrist is rated so highly because he occasionally pulls off some amazing takes and because of his batting.chaminda_00 said:Best Gloveman in the World, i don't think so, guys like Gilchirst, Read and Boucher are all better with the gloves then him
These amazing takes (so called) are all while standing back. Ask anyone who has kept wickets and they will tell you these are not all that difficult to take (relatively speaking) though they look fantastic because of the distance covered in a dive and the one handed take in an outstretched glove. But the time you get makes all the difference.Dasa said:I haven't seen much of Read so I can't comment, but Taibu is a better pure 'keeper than the other 2. Boucher is steady without being brilliant, and Gilchrist is rated so highly because he occasionally pulls off some amazing takes and because of his batting.
Don't forget Gilchrist made a stumping off McGrath.SJS said:These amazing takes (so called) are all while standing back. Ask anyone who has kept wickets and they will tell you these are not all that difficult to take (relatively speaking) though they look fantastic because of the distance covered in a dive and the one handed take in an outstretched glove. But the time you get makes all the difference.
The true test of a great keeper is standing up and here Gilchrist is no match to someone like, say, Healy (to take an Australian example).
Tell me have you ever kept wickets ? This is a serious question not an attempt to make fun .mavric41 said:Don't forget Gilchrist made a stumping off McGrath.
That brings up a question for me.Jono said:How ironic that this came up, because I was having this same discussion with my friend just yesterday about this. I feel he'd walk into India's side without question, and would make Sri Lanka's side, with Sangakkara being played solely as a batsman. I'm not sure about NZ over McCullum, that's debateable, but WI, SA (especially with the quota system, but even without it maybe), Pak, Eng etc. would love to have Taibu in their team.
Sorry mate, I was not being sarcastic when I asked you if you had kept wickets. I really wanted to know.mavric41 said:Don't forget Gilchrist made a stumping off McGrath.
Has Taibu kept to a quailty spinner, the test of a keeper is how good he is standing up, as someone said earlier. Taibu does stand up to Streak, Hondo, Ervine and other but Boucher has stood up to Klusener and other bowlers of similar pace and faster pace then the Zimbabwe bowlers which makes him better standing up. Taibu also hasn't kept to a quality spinner unlike Kamran and Gilchrist. Both these guys look at great keeping to spinners, in particular Kamran when he kept to Kaneria, he looked brilliant. All in all their are better keepers in the world then Taibu as they proven themsleves standiong up to medium pace bowlers, who are generally faster then the Zimbabwe bowlers and they also kept to quality spinners unlike Taibu. Until Taibu keeps to a quality spin bowlers then Gilchrist, Boucher, Read and Kamran will all be better keepers then him IMO.Dasa said:I haven't seen much of Read so I can't comment, but Taibu is a better pure 'keeper than the other 2. Boucher is steady without being brilliant, and Gilchrist is rated so highly because he occasionally pulls off some amazing takes and because of his batting.
yep better keeper than Jones and better batsman than Read.Perfect for no.7Neil Pickup said:Undoutably so. Comfortably a better gloveman than Karthik, Dhoni or Patel, and an accomplished batsman. Heck, I'd pick him in the England Test and ODI sides...
chaminda_00 said:Boucher is a better keeper
Are you joking or drunk?! Read perhaps, but...?!chaminda_00 said:Best Gloveman in the World, i don't think so, guys like Gilchirst, Read and Boucher are all better with the gloves then him
Yet Taibu misses less chances. He takes just about all the regulation chances and pulls off tough ones on a fairly regular basis. Meanwhile Boucher's 'keeping has been far from amazing in recent years and Gilchrist was never as technically and generally sound behind the stumps as Taibu is and always has been. Read is an excellent wicketkeeper so you do have an argument there. Kamran is pretty good too, but please, stop having a laugh.chaminda_00 said:Has Taibu kept to a quailty spinner, the test of a keeper is how good he is standing up, as someone said earlier. Taibu does stand up to Streak, Hondo, Ervine and other but Boucher has stood up to Klusener and other bowlers of similar pace and faster pace then the Zimbabwe bowlers which makes him better standing up. Taibu also hasn't kept to a quality spinner unlike Kamran and Gilchrist. Both these guys look at great keeping to spinners, in particular Kamran when he kept to Kaneria, he looked brilliant. All in all their are better keepers in the world then Taibu as they proven themsleves standiong up to medium pace bowlers, who are generally faster then the Zimbabwe bowlers and they also kept to quality spinners unlike Taibu. Until Taibu keeps to a quality spin bowlers then Gilchrist, Boucher, Read and Kamran will all be better keepers then him IMO.
I really can't see why people keep think that he is so much better then all the other keepers in the wrold. 1st of all he has never kept to quailty spinners, the last time he kept to a spinner of any note (Price), he consitenly missed the odd stumping. Therefore demising the theory that he misses less chances. Also chances have to be created for u to miss a chance, how many chances do the Zimbabwe attack with their top players create, compared to the other counties. An example of this is Sangakkara keeping in the World XI/Asia XI game, probably the best i've ever seen him keep to Murali. But if look it more closer u will see that Murali proabably bowled the worst he has in a couple year, therefore creating less chances.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Yet Taibu misses less chances. He takes just about all the regulation chances and pulls off tough ones on a fairly regular basis. Meanwhile Boucher's 'keeping has been far from amazing in recent years and Gilchrist was never as technically and generally sound behind the stumps as Taibu is and always has been. Read is an excellent wicketkeeper so you do have an argument there. Kamran is pretty good too, but please, stop having a laugh.
Dinesh Kaarthick? He has been quite brilliant, although at times inconsistent, to the spinners on rank turners.chaminda_00 said:I really can't see why people keep think that he is so much better then all the other keepers in the wrold. 1st of all he has never kept to quailty spinners, the last time he kept to a spinner of any note (Price), he consitenly missed the odd stumping. Therefore demising the theory that he misses less chances. Also chances have to be created for u to miss a chance, how many chances do the Zimbabwe attack with their top players create, compared to the other counties. An example of this is Sangakkara keeping in the World XI/Asia XI game, probably the best i've ever seen him keep to Murali. But if look it more closer u will see that Murali proabably bowled the worst he has in a couple year, therefore creating less chances.
Taibu might look great when standing up to medium pace bowlers, but u have to remember the guys he stands up to a slower then the bowlers from other countries. Allot easier standing up to 120 to 125kmh then 130 kmh plus, Streak being the exception from time to time.
Boucher may not be as good as he was couple season but he did set high standard for himself and he still outshowed Taibu if u take everything into consideration.
Gilchirst may not be technically sound but cus he keeps to Warne. I can't see Taibu keeping better to Warne, considering how he kept to Price.
Also u name me a keeper who kept better quality spin bowling then Kamran recently, he is technically as sound a keeper as you'll find.