Still better than Harris. Was shocked to see that the useless **** had somehow managed to take 103 test scalps.If you lower the mark to 98 test wickets, then surely Sanath Jayasuriya would be a worthy nomination.
Always got confused between Wiseman and Spearman.lol @ Craig Spearman...wtf
Wiseman doesn't have a 100 test wickets. Neither does Raju..Always got confused between Wiseman and Spearman.
And Nicky Boje among specialist spinners, it has to be.Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Carl Hooper according to average.
I really don't agree at all.Still better than Harris.
He actually averaged 24 against India. No doubt he was pretty average but what Ganguly could or couldn't do to him seems like a poor example...And Nicky Boje among specialist spinners, it has to be.
Ganguly could deposit him in different parts of any stadium whenever he wanted to...
Paul Harris doesn't offer anything with the bat.Interesting to see that Tuffers is the worst statistically who was only in the team as a bowler. Most of the others on that 'worst' list that Hurricane posted up offered something with the bat. Pretty harsh on Tuffers though who was a better bowler than that IMO.
Haha yeah I know, and Ganguly's example was a light-hearted comment and mainly based on ODIs - so not of any relevance here, or not a reason why I vote for Boje here.He actually averaged 24 against India. No doubt he was pretty average but what Ganguly could or couldn't do to him seems like a poor example...
Well STFU then.Haha yeah I know, and Ganguly's example was a light-hearted comment and mainly based on ODIs - so not of any relevance here, or not a reason why I vote for Boje here.
Offers considerably more than Tuffers considering their averages are about the same. That said, I'd say Tuffers was considerably better with the ball than Harris; even if the averages don't bear that out.Paul Harris doesn't offer anything with the bat.