ankitj
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If that was the case Dhoni wouldn't have been the first to get picked.I feel like a lot of people's opinions re: ODI cricketers are influenced somewhat by their Test ability. Even ATG ones.
If that was the case Dhoni wouldn't have been the first to get picked.I feel like a lot of people's opinions re: ODI cricketers are influenced somewhat by their Test ability. Even ATG ones.
It may be because statistically he wasn't quite as strong in World Cups as he was in most other series.What took so long for Bevan to be picked?! He is typically a lock in top 10 ODI player countdowns. Is RedHill having an influence on everyone?
You dramatically underrate him and his abilities.If you actually calculate Bevan's average by innings but discount not outs, he only averages 35. Pretty much the same as plenty of other contemporaries, including Hussey and Mark Waugh. Sachin averaged 40 and Kohli is averaging 50. Smith averages 36 per innings.
He finished a couple of games and a myth developed around his abilities. He wasn't actually as good as people make out, and he was/is nowhere near the GOAT in that format. Not even top 10 IMO.
I really don't think I do and I'm yet to be convinced otherwise.You dramatically underrate him and his abilities.
He was by far the best ODI batsman in Australia and was often the difference between victory and defeat. RPI being as high as an opener or someone playing in easier batting conditions is a testament to his abilities, given he spent the majority of his career at 4 and 6.I really don't think I do and I'm yet to be convinced otherwise.
Runs per innings tells his true story.
Plenty of individual performances are the difference between victory and defeat. He's no different to anyone else. Hence the myth.He was by far the best ODI batsman in Australia and was often the difference between victory and defeat. RPI being as high as an opener or someone playing in easier batting conditions is a testament to his abilities, given he spent the majority of his career at 4 and 6.
Yeh, well pretty much most ODIs where one of the 4-6 batsmen is not out will result in a win for that team. Doesn't mean much. Give me Mike Hussey any day who could do everything Bevan could do plus hit much more powerfully when required.When Bevan ended up not out, Australia nearly always won.
The 2 greatest ODI spinners already got picked thoughFmd people under rate Australian players on this forum. Warne should have gone forest round given he basically won the 99 WC single handedly. Morgieb should gave picked him up second round to have the best spin bowling attack by 13 country miles.
True but there still aren't many world class spinners so they should be the first players picked in any draft IMO.Warne featured in only two WCs, cups filled with ATGs.
Saqlain is overrated in ODIs. Particularly when we're talking world cups. Warne has a better record in them.The 2 greatest ODI spinners already got picked though
A much, much likelier explanation is you overrate some Australian players.Fmd people under rate Australian players on this forum.
He outdoes Warne on basically every metric in overall career stats though. Much like how Warne does him in tests.Saqlain is overrated in ODIs. Particularly when we're talking world cups. Warne has a better record in them.
Yeah but this draft is specifically about world cups.He outdoes Warne on basically every metric in overall career stats though. Much like how Warne does him in tests.