• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Woodhill's moneyballing it

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
You can't "moneyball" any sport on statistical modelling alone. It's about working out how to solve a problem, using what numbers tell you - go with what history has said will work in the past, we all have memory biases. Of course that's not perfect, but you can live with the decision easier knowing that you got beaten by a person playing better on the night.

And it's no different to other sports - a 25% three point shooter in basketball hitting 67% for the night, for example. If he pulls that out then fair enough, well played.

Yes but there is more of a predictability factor as to what a guy with the ball in a basketball game can do but the sheer size of the cricket ground and the length of the pitch, the width of the crease etc. etc. just makes it so much more difficult to get in that level of predictions, which is why I feel my view on this can be broken down in 3 bits which I mentioned earlier (as it pertains to the usage of stats that goes beyond the basic cricket data that is kept currently and usage of big data, analytical models etc.)

1. It makes sense when it comes to choosing players - basically what the list manager is actually supposed to do. The example of Hastings' replacement is a good one.
2. It is ok as a theory feeder when it comes to working out match ups but I still feel gut feeling and game nous will work better as far as cricket is concerned.
3. Predicting batsmen or bowlers' responses and the amount of trust you can give to that kind of data is where, to me, it will differ from how say sabermetrics is used in baseball.

Vic, think we are just making the same points, but with different words. I already agreed that as something to feed cricket theorists and strategists, I definitely see the value of such data being kept and mined, esp. the T20 leagues.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I suppose T20 being the shortest format lends itself to more variability in terms of upsets etc. So a team that can gain marginal advantages from data analytics might, in theory, be able to "punch above their weight", as opposed to the longer format, where cricketing skill, physical endurance and mental strength will ultimately win over most of the time.
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
This is how Northants have had their T20 success. There was an article on it on cricinfo recently.
 

Top