Well I'd class it as a match-winning performance since he's just taken all the chances and if he had not then his team probably wouldn't have won.Richard said:No, it's just doing what you expect a wicketkeeper to do.
Fair enough - he's played a large part in the winning of the match.Rik said:Well I'd class it as a match-winning performance since he's just taken all the chances and if he had not then his team probably wouldn't have won.
Well he's certainly not rated by every pundit to be so.jamesryfler said:Rashan Peiris is actually rated by pundits to be Lanka's best keeper.
But I presume Sangakkara is preferred for his superior batting.
So why didn't you praise Boucher then?Ford_GTHO351 said:Numbers don't lie
We can accept that he's a better keeper than he was - but he's not the best by any stretch of the imagination.Tim said:I agree, I think it's about time people got over the fact that Gilchrist has actually improved his keeping alot from when he first established himself as the Australian keeper.
I think people are just trying to hold on to perhaps the one weakness in the Australian team & don't want to accept that Gilchrist has got better.
Testsmarc71178 said:So why didn't you praise Boucher then?
How can you ignore the number of dismissals by a keeper in determing their ability :ONeil Pickup said:And dismissals don't show a keeper's ability.