Streetwise
Banned
Juz like we can call out guys who seem to live in denial that all cricketers are being treated same today to be ****ing stupid???????????
Juz like we can call out guys who seem to live in denial that all cricketers are being treated same today to be ****ing stupid???????????
Gah, baked beans!Guys, let's just have a family bucket...
Oh, sweet irony.Extremely healthy as we have clear skies and the rays of FACTS fall directly upon us and not lost in the clouds of bias and defensiveness.
No... I don't think it is fair to punish a guy for something that is not considered an offence just because some idiot punished someone else for the same some years back..Oh, sweet irony.
Jono has been pretty much the only one arguing the double-standards case in a respectful manner, the rest has been nothing short of disgraceful.
Am I unreasonable in thinking that is a tad unfair to bleat on about double standards over two incidents that occurred a decade apart? I mean it will have been separate people making those decisions, and in all honesty the fact that one occurred before Ovalgate and one after has to be taken into account doesn't it? As that has changed the way ball tampering will be approached forever as far as I can see.
I blame Chris Broad for all this...Extremely healthy as we have clear skies and the rays of FACTS fall directly upon us and not lost in the clouds of bias and defensiveness.
Explains why it has been raining in Chennai in January, tbh.. Something I haven't seen so far in my lifetime.. First Bret Hart comes back to WWE and now Burgey actually blames Chris Broad for something..I blame Chris Broad for all this...
My gripe here is Vaughan's original comment. Would this have been let go had it been Akhtar or Asif ????
Hahaha and by different people! Double standards are when the same person treats the same situation differently depending on who was involved, not when two different people make two different decisions in two different (albeit similar) situations ten years apart!Oh, sweet irony.
Jono has been pretty much the only one arguing the double-standards case in a respectful manner, the rest has been nothing short of disgraceful.
Am I unreasonable in thinking that is a tad unfair to bleat on about double standards over two incidents that occurred a decade apart? I mean it will have been separate people making those decisions, and in all honesty the fact that one occurred before Ovalgate and one after has to be taken into account doesn't it? As that has changed the way ball tampering will be approached forever as far as I can see.
You are thinking of lawn bowls, great game but not statisticly arousing.There is a bias for white cricketing countries.
Problem is when it comes to subcontinental sides they become regionalist too!I think Asoka De Silva and Asaud Rauf are racist.
And to me, that's saying something.Vaughan really does come off as a prick in retirement, much moreso than he ever did when he played.
yeah, BASED ON THE SAME RULES!!! Or are those different too?Hahaha and by different people! Double standards are when the same person treats the same situation differently depending on who was involved, not when two different people make two different decisions in two different (albeit similar) situations ten years apart!