honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
It's extremely useful at the lower levels. As the standards get higher the advantage is less pronounced but it is still useful esp in LO games where one side of the boundary is short
Just him being typically consistent.
Proportionally there are roughly twice as many Test left-handers as during the 1980s, and three times the proportion before WW1.
Similarly maybe more natural left-handers were just taking right-handed batting stances back then.England had played over a hundred Tests before Woolley became their first left-handed batsman to score a century.
Yes they were.Similarly maybe more natural left-handers were just taking right-handed batting stances back then.
Why not Hunte?Given the option, I'd rather open with Greenidge and Fredricks than Greenidge and Haynes. Both Fredricks and Haynes are there about quality wise but yeah being left handed for me, in my puny little mind, I feel like typical opening bowlers would be a little put off.
Maybe counter that by opening the bowling with a left arm and right arm bowlers.