honestbharani said:Taufel
Dar
For me the worst is Bucknor.
I guess Bucknors best days are over
honestbharani said:Taufel
Dar
For me the worst is Bucknor.
Now then, that's enough of that.Dasa said:..or perhaps people have a memory that extends beyond the previous Test.
The problem is, one of them can be easily determined, but the other much less so (as witnessed by the supposedly shocking LBW that took 15 minutes for anyone to confirm a slight edge)howardj said:Have to agree with Warne's calls for the video replay to be used for edges onto the pad, and to see whether the ball pitched outside leg-stump.
Big deal mate. You have a look at the replay, and if it can help you - which it can on with most inside edges - then you use it. If it can not help you, then it's thrown back to the umpire. The point is that the replay is used, not as some magic device that's going to be conclusive 100% of the time, but as an extra tool to help decision making.marc71178 said:The problem is, one of them can be easily determined, but the other much less so (as witnessed by the supposedly shocking LBW that took 15 minutes for anyone to confirm a slight edge)
Warne's call has no logic beyond those being the two modes of dismissal which cost Australia in the last test.Armadillo said:I agree with the technology. How many people actually think that hawkeye is 100% correct? Sometimes I feel that it gets it fractionally wrong on occasions, nothing significant enough to make a huge difference, does anyone know how it gets the results that it produces?
By the way I think Dar is a top umpire, so glad that Pakistan finally produced one!