• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who would you rather have come in at No. 6 for your team with 15 overs to go?

4 down, 15 to go, who comes in?

  • Player A

    Votes: 4 26.7%

  • Player B

    Votes: 11 73.3%
  • Total voters
    15
C

CaptainGrumpy

Banned
Howe_zat said:
unbe****inglievable

TIL the point of cricket is not to win
Click to expand...
Well - put it this way - Tyrannosaurus Rex was a badass mofo in his day. Possibly undefeated. But even that bad boy aint got shiyat on the US Military. I'm sure the karate students of Hiroshima would have liked a battle in hand to hand combat.
 
Last edited:
Athlai

Athlai

Not Terrible
Tyrannosaurus Rex would wreck any soldier to this day. Sure a machine built by hundreds with millions even billions of technological progress put into it could topple the beast. But if we gave the T-Rex an Apache helicopter, A deadly combination of teeth, missiles and a machine gun?

Then Bradman is still the best.
 
C

CaptainGrumpy

Banned
Athlai said:
T But if we gave the T-Rex an Apache helicopter, A deadly combination of teeth, missiles and a machine gun?

.
Click to expand...
His upper arms/legs are too short to reach the controls and he does not have opposing thumbs to use those hands or arms effectively. He has to go pure kung fu but of a style that makes good use of his tail.

Plus - the Yanks would still nuke him.
 
Athlai

Athlai

Not Terrible
Why would we build human controls for a T-Rex clearly this would be augmented with its already considerable frame, controlled on a neural basis.

Sometimes I doubt the thought you put into some of your statements.
 
C

CaptainGrumpy

Banned
Athlai said:
Why would we build human controls for a T-Rex clearly this would be augmented with its already considerable frame, controlled on a neural basis.

Sometimes I doubt the thought you put into some of your statements.
Click to expand...
So we build the weapons for the T-Rex after studying its mind, and then giving its the tools, weapons and resources to defeat us that the USA would not even give to members of its own species?

And then after going to war with us, we continue to supply it fuel and ammunition? No. First winter and that bad boy is extinct again.

It will not hand the blitzkreig of drones as it tries to fly around in its jumbo sized apache helicopter.

Its hard to get shiyat done without opposing thumbs.
 
Last edited:
Johnners

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Blocky's posts are made in an inefficient manner, and are therefore worthless information, not sure why people are bothering to respond to them.
 
C

CaptainGrumpy

Banned
kiwiviktor81 said:
What do you think of Martin Guptill?
Click to expand...
One of the NZ's best limited over players.

Has the talent to succeed in tests, think he goes into his shell and scores too slowly at times and gets out. He should play his natural games in tests and score more swiftly and his stats would improve.

I'm actually mates with his top order batting partner from high school and club. We've both been invited to a relatively close and quaint leaving party. I'm not sure if I will attend, however.
 
Last edited:
HeathDavisSpeed

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Anyway, I tried to read this thread and it is total bollocks filled with 'banter' than even school children would be embarrassed by.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top