Ikki
Hall of Fame Member
I apologise. It's one thing for someone to believe in something and represent their argument through some sort of statistical analysis. It is another thing altogether when said argument is more charlatanism than scholarly. I may not be a big fan of Gavaskar, for example, but I will never try to represent performance over 2 innings as a facet of a weakness in his batting. It is not intelligent and moreover it is not fair or reliable evidence.
Last edited: