Shane Warne
Banned
with an international appereance to their name
Why is Jason Brown there then?Shane Warne said:with an international appereance to their name
Giles is not crap, or did I imagine his 16 wickets in 2 Test's in SL or his series in Pakistan?!halsey said:Including Tuffers is an insult. But I admit Giles is crap.
Allright, he is handy in helpful conditions. But apart from that, he is largely blunt.marc71178 said:Giles is not crap, or did I imagine his 16 wickets in 2 Test's in SL or his series in Pakistan?!
Why? I dont think serving spinners who arent good to subcontinent batsmen in subcontinent does much.jamee999 said:Because we need spinners on the sub-continent
Interestingly Giles has a better SR and a similar average to Tufnell.halsey said:Including Tuffers is an insult. But I admit Giles is crap.
But Giles has been fairly decent on the subcontinent.Pratyush said:Why? I dont think serving spinners who arent good to subcontinent batsmen in subcontinent does much.
True. But for natural ability I'd go for Tuffers any day. Contrary to his public image, with feet splayed at ten to two, his main problem was self belief.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Interestingly Giles has a better SR and a similar average to Tufnell.
Relation to Marcus by chance?PY said:Michael Trescothick
It is at this point that I remind you that Tres bowls seam.PY said:If you talk about variation, why not use Michael Vaughan or Michael Trescothick as temporary spin options.
Agreed. Also, if he will be bowling in the mindset that some are suggesting he will in the West Indies I would suggest that he doesn't play. Give another bowler a chance (a swing bowler perhaps?) and let Vaughan do the negative tactics.PY said:I don't think it's Gile-o's fault because I like him but IMO he doesn't deserve a place in England.
I'm almost certain I've seen Trescothick bowling spin before (well tweakers anyway) as well as his usual medium paced tripe.halsey said:It is at this point that I remind you that Tres bowls seam.