He has always been a bit like that..Jono said:Ponting. He's annoying when he gets set, because he'll punish you.
Hayden and Gilchrist are obviously very dangerous as well, but you're more likely to get a gifted wicket from them, rather than from Ponting when he gets past 50.
Hayden bounced out?twctopcat said:Definitely Ponting and Martyn in tests. Hayden will be bounced out and Langer is still susceptible to the swinging ball. With Ponting and Martyn though it isn't so easy.
The difference being, Symonds is in a team with at least 3 players who are a lot more feared than him - Flintoff isn't (I mean who would you prefer to bowl to, a top 3 of Gilchrist, Hayden, Ponting or Treescothick, Solanki, Vaughan?)Craig said:Granted - but be fair to the guy on what position he bats in.
Your comment there is like me saying something along the lines of Flintoff only having two ODI hundreds.
I think you're right there. Hayden has never been bounced out, although he has been tempted into hitting the ball down the throat of the deep square leg fielder on more than one occasion.Craig said:Not excatly being 'bounced out'.
Exactly my point, he has been tempted. My point was that he hasn't faced Harmison on form and has never faced Flintoff in tests. They did fairly well to ruffle the feathers of a mr lara this summer and he's not known to be bad at the short ball. And let's not get into the lara va hayden debate. I was just trying to point out that his eagerness to dominate bowlers can be his downfall.Mr Casson said:I think you're right there. Hayden has never been bounced out, although he has been tempted into hitting the ball down the throat of the deep square leg fielder on more than one occasion.
Thats an interesting point. It will be good to see this battle. But there is no merit , before that, to suggest that Hayden has a chink in his armour as far as quick short pitched bowling is concerned.twctopcat said:Exactly my point, he has been tempted. My point was that he hasn't faced Harmison on form and has never faced Flintoff in tests. They did fairly well to ruffle the feathers of a mr lara this summer and he's not known to be bad at the short ball. And let's not get into the lara va hayden debate. I was just trying to point out that his eagerness to dominate bowlers can be his downfall.
I just thought back to the end of the last ashes series where i remember that was the impression i got. To be honest i haven't seen evidence recently but then again there isn't that much good short pitch bowlers in the world, or should i say there weren't.SJS said:Thats an interesting point. It will be good to see this battle. But there is no merit , before that, to suggest that Hayden has a chink in his armour as far as quick short pitched bowling is concerned.
seems to me that your version of bouncing out is the defensive and typically english version, with two men out on the fence and hoping that the batsman will hit one down ur throat. the australian people in this thread would probably recognise it as having a leg gully in, and a short leg , and trying to attack the batsman (which wouldn't work with a proficient player off the back foot like hayden), instead of waiting for a mistake. if england take these sort of tactics into the test (softcore bodyline :P) then they can have fun taking catches ten rows backtwctopcat said:I just thought back to the end of the last ashes series where i remember that was the impression i got. To be honest i haven't seen evidence recently but then again there isn't that much good short pitch bowlers in the world, or should i say there weren't.
I doubt England will bother with that, just let Harmison put him firmly on the back-foot then put in the fuller on and watch him edge it to slip - just like in the Champions Trophy. Easy as shelling peas really...vic_orthdox said:seems to me that your version of bouncing out is the defensive and typically english version, with two men out on the fence and hoping that the batsman will hit one down ur throat. the australian people in this thread would probably recognise it as having a leg gully in, and a short leg , and trying to attack the batsman (which wouldn't work with a proficient player off the back foot like hayden), instead of waiting for a mistake. if england take these sort of tactics into the test (softcore bodyline :P) then they can have fun taking catches ten rows back
Scaly piscine summed it up perfectly, but you can say whatever you want. But if we get him out by him hitting it 3 miles in the air then it doesn't matter where the field placings are.vic_orthdox said:seems to me that your version of bouncing out is the defensive and typically english version, with two men out on the fence and hoping that the batsman will hit one down ur throat. the australian people in this thread would probably recognise it as having a leg gully in, and a short leg , and trying to attack the batsman (which wouldn't work with a proficient player off the back foot like hayden), instead of waiting for a mistake. if england take these sort of tactics into the test (softcore bodyline :P) then they can have fun taking catches ten rows back