• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who do you think will be a better bet as a test allrounder in future?

marc71178

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Well be fair to him - he might not be suited to the role the Australian's want from him, but Harvey's nowhere near good enough, and Symonds isn't a bowler.
 
deeps

deeps

International 12th Man
Shahid Afridi

Not sure if he's been mentioned yet.. Has better stats than Flintoff at test level. Bob Woolmer has really turned him around
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Consecutive half centuries for Pathan, and once again runs at crucial times. Can't bat eh? :)
 
Arjun

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Not bad for Irfan, and given his run of form, the Indian side should include a practising all-rounder as well in Tests as well as ODI's. Someone like Joginder Sharma or JP Yadav should make the side– now that's tremendous value addition to the side.

p.s. You can safely replace AA with VRV now.
 
vic_orthdox

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
dontcloseyoureyes said:
Suggesting that Symonds, Harvey and Lee have more all-round ability than Watson is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
I'd be tempted to say that Harvey had more all-round ability than Watson. He just didn't care enough.

At his old club side, used to get the nickname "Harvey-Norman", because there was no interest...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top